Advertisement

A framework for the implementation of new radiation therapy technologies and treatment techniques in low-income countries

Published:August 02, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.07.004

      Abstract

      We present a practical, generic, easy-to-use framework for the implementation of new radiation therapy technologies and treatment techniques in low-income countries. The framework is intended to standardize the implementation process, reduce the effort involved in generating an implementation strategy, and provide improved patient safety by reducing the likelihood that steps are missed during the implementation process. The 10 steps in the framework provide a practical approach to implementation. The steps are, 1) Site and resource assessment, 2) Evaluation of equipment and funding, 3) Establishing timelines, 4) Defining the treatment process, 5) Equipment commissioning, 6) Training and competency assessment, 7) Prospective risk analysis, 8) System testing, 9) External dosimetric audit and incident learning, and 10) Support and follow-up. For each step, practical advice for completing the step is provided, as well as links to helpful supplementary material. An associated checklist is provided that can be used to track progress through the steps in the framework. While the emphasis of this paper is on addressing the needs of low-income countries, the concepts also apply in high-income countries.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. International Atomic Energy Agency. DIRAC (Directory of radiotherapy centres). http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nahu/dirac/.

        • International Atomic Energy Agency
        Setting up a radiotherapy programme Clinical, medical physics, radiation Protection and safety aspects.
        International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna2008
        • International Atomic Energy Agency
        Transition from 2-D radiotherapy to 3-D conformal and intensity modulated radiotherapy.
        (IAEA-TECDOC-1588) International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna2008
        • Donaldson S.R.
        Towards safer radiotherapy.
        British Institute of Radiology, Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, National Patient Safety Agency, Society and College of Radio-Graphers, the Royal College of Radiologists, London2007
      2. United States Department of Veterans Affairs. Healthcare failure mode and Effect analysis. http://www.patientsafety.gov/SafetyTopics.html-HFMEA.

        • World Health Organization
        Radiotherapy risk profile.
        WHO Press, Geneva2008
      3. American Society for Radiation Oncology – Target Safely.
        • Hendee W.R.
        • Herman M.G.
        Improving patient safety in radiation oncology.
        Med Phys. 2011; 38: 78-82
        • Huq M.S.
        • Fraass B.A.
        • Dunscombe P.B.
        • Gibbons Jr., J.P.
        • Ibbott G.S.
        • Medin P.M.
        • et al.
        A method for evaluating quality assurance needs in radiation therapy.
        Int Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 71: S170-S173
        • Ortiz Lopez P.
        • Cosset J.M.
        • Dunscombe P.
        • Holmberg O.
        • Rosenwald J.C.
        • Pinillos Ashton L.
        • et al.
        ICRP publication 112. A report of preventing accidental exposures from new external beam radiation therapy technologies.
        Ann ICRP. 2009; 39: 1-86
        • Dunscombe P.
        Recommendations for safer radiotherapy: what's the message?.
        Front Oncol. 2012; 2: 129
      4. International Atomic Energy Agency. Staffing and cost calculation. International atomic Energy Agency; 2014. http://nucleus.iaea.org/HHW/RadiationOncology/Makingthecaseforradiotherapyinyourcountry/Roleofradiotherapyincancercare/Radiotherapyisacosteffectivesystemwhichneedsabalance/index.html.

        • International Atomic Energy Agency
        Staffing in radiotherapy: an activity based approach. In preparation.
        International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna2014
        • Potter R.
        • Eriksen J.G.
        • Beavis A.W.
        • Coffey M.
        • Verfaillie C.
        • Leer J.W.
        • et al.
        Competencies in radiation oncology: a new approach for education and training of professionals for radiotherapy and oncology in Europe.
        Radiother Oncol. 2012; 103: 1-4
        • Eriksen J.G.
        • Beavis A.W.
        • Coffey M.A.
        • Leer J.W.
        • Magrini S.M.
        • Benstead K.
        • et al.
        The updated ESTRO core curricula 2011 for clinicians, medical physicists and RTTs in radiotherapy/radiation oncology.
        Radiother Oncol. 2012; 103: 103-108
        • Paliwal B.
        • DeLuca P.
        • Grein E.
        • Herbert D.
        • Jackson E.
        • Podgorsak E.
        • et al.
        AAPM report No. 197.
        Academic Program Recommendations for Graduate Degrees in Medical Physics, 2009
        • International Atomic Energy Agency
        Roles and responsibilities, and education and training requirements for clinically qualified medical physicists.
        (IAEA Human Health Series No 25) International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna2013
        • International Atomic Energy Agency
        Clinical training of medical physicists specializing in radiation oncology.
        (Training course Series 37) International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna2009
        • International Atomic Energy Agency
        Clinical training of medical physicists specializing in diagnostic radiology.
        (Training course Series 47) International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna2010
        • International Atomic Energy Agency
        Clinical training of medical physicists specializing in nuclear medicine.
        (Training course Series 50) International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna2011
        • International Atomic Energy Agency
        A syllabus for the education and training of rtts (radiation therapists/therapy radiographers).
        (Training course Series 25) International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna2005
        • Galvin J.M.
        • Claytor N.
        • Cedrone B.
        • Graff R.L.
        A guide to design of radiation therapy facilities.
        Appl Radiol. 1985; 14: 86-90
        • International Atomic Energy Agency
        Planning national radiotherapy services a practical tool.
        (IAEA Human Health Series No 14) International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna2010
        • Van Dyk J.
        Megavoltage radiation therapy: meeting the technological needs. Standards and codes of practice in medical radiation dosimetry.
        International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria2002
        • Chalkidou K.
        • Marquez P.
        • Dhillon P.K.
        • Teerawattananon Y.
        • Anothaisintawee T.
        • Gadelha C.A.
        • et al.
        Evidence-informed frameworks for cost-effective cancer care and prevention in low, middle, and high-income countries.
        Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15: e119-e131
        • Loudon J.
        Applying project management processes to successfully complete projects in radiation medicine.
        J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2012; 43: 253-258
        • Thomadsen B.
        • Brown D.
        • Ford E.
        • Huq S.
        • Rath F.
        Risk assessment using the TG-100 methodology.
        in: Thomadsen B. Quality and safety in radiotherapy. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI2013: 98-102
        • Trebble T.M.
        • Hansi N.
        • Hydes T.
        • Smith M.A.
        • Baker M.
        Process mapping the patient journey: an introduction.
        BMJ. 2010; 341 (c4078)
        • Savory P.
        • Olson J.
        Guidelines for using process mapping to aid improvement efforts.
        Hosp Manage Q. 2001; 22: 10-16
        • Fraass B.
        • Doppke K.
        • Hunt M.
        • Kutcher G.
        • Starkschall G.
        • Stern R.
        • et al.
        American association of physicists in medicine radiation therapy committee task group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning.
        Med Phys. 1998; 25: 1773-1829
        • Das I.J.
        • Cheng C.W.
        • Watts R.J.
        • Ahnesjo A.
        • Gibbons J.
        • Li X.A.
        • et al.
        Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: report of the TG-106 of the therapy physics committee of the AAPM.
        Med Phys. 2008; 35: 4186-4215
        • Klein E.E.
        • Hanley J.
        • Bayouth J.
        • Yin F.F.
        • Simon W.
        • Dresser S.
        • et al.
        Task group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators.
        Med Phys. 2009; 36: 4197-4212
        • Suntharalingam N.
        • Podgorsak E.
        • Tolli H.
        Brachytherapy: physical and clinical aspects.
        in: Podgorsak E. Radiation oncology physics: a handbook for teachers and students. IAEA, Vienna2005: 392-395
        • Van Dyk J.
        CT Simulators. The modern technology of radiation oncology: a compendium for medical physicists and radiation oncologists.
        Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI1999: 160-164 (p.)
        • International Atomic Energy Agency
        Commissioning of radiotherapy treatment planning Systems: testing for typical external beam treatment techniques; report of the coordinated research project (CRP) on development of procedures for quality assurance of dosimetry calculations in radiotherapy.
        (IAEA-TECDOC-1583) International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna2008
        • Horton J.
        Acceptance tests and commissioning measurements.
        in: Podgorsak E. Radiation oncology physics: a handbook for teachers and students. IAEA, Vienna2005: 355-386
        • Evans M.
        Computerized treatment planning systems for external beam radiotherapy.
        in: Podgorsak E. Radiation oncology physics: a handbook for teachers and students. IAEA, Vienna2005: 387-406
        • Thwaites D.
        • Mijnheer B.
        • Mills J.
        Quality assurance of external beam radiotherapy.
        in: Podgorsak E. Radiation oncology physics: a handbook for teachers and students. IAEA, Vienna2005: 407-450
        • International Atomic Energy Agency
        Human health campus, medical physics, radiotherapy.
        International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna2013
      5. American Association of Physicists in Medicine – Publications. Available at: http://aapmorg/pubs/reports.

        • Van Dyk J.
        The modern technology of radiation oncology: a compendium for medical physicists and radiation oncologists.
        in: Van Dyk J. Radiation oncology medical physics resources for teaching and learningworking. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI2013
      6. TreatSafely. Practical learning for RT professionals. http://i.treatsafely.org.

        • Smajo M.
        Medical physics clinical skills workbook for therapy physics chicago: rosalind franklin university of medicine and science college of health professionals.
        2012
        • Ortiz Lopez P.
        Tools for risk assessment in radiation therapy.
        Ann ICRP. 2012; 41: 197-207
        • Ford E.C.
        • Gaudette R.
        • Myers L.
        • Vanderver B.
        • Engineer L.
        • Zellars R.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of safety in a radiation oncology setting using failure mode and effects analysis.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 74: 852-858
        • Ford E.C.
        • Smith K.
        • Terezakis S.
        • Croog V.
        • Gollamudi S.
        • Gage I.
        • et al.
        A streamlined failure mode and effects analysis.
        Med Phys. 2014; 41 (061709)
        • Kapur A.
        • Potters L.
        Six sigma tools for a patient safety-oriented, quality-checklist driven radiation medicine department.
        Pract Radiat Oncol. 2012; 2: 86-96
        • Clark B.G.
        • Brown R.J.
        • Ploquin J.L.
        • Kind A.L.
        • Grimard L.
        The management of radiation treatment error through incident learning.
        Radiother Oncol. 2010; 95: 344-349
        • Ford E.C.
        • Fong de Los Santos L.
        • Pawlicki T.
        • Sutlief S.
        • Dunscombe P.
        Consensus recommendations for incident learning database structures in radiation oncology.
        Med Phys. 2012; 39: 7272-7290
        • Cooke D.
        • Dubetz M.
        • Heshmati R.
        • Iftody S.
        • McKimmon E.
        • Powers J.
        • et al.
        A reference guide for learning from incidents in radiation treatment.
        (Health technology assessment unit)2006
        • Izewska J.
        • Andreo P.
        The IAEA/WHO TLD postal programme for radiotherapy hospitals.
        Radiother Oncol. 2000; 54: 65-72
        • Izewska J.
        • Andreo P.
        • Vatnitsky S.
        • Shortt K.
        The IAEA/WHO TLD postal dose quality audits for radiotherapy: a perspective of dosimetry practices at hospitals in developing countries.
        Radiother Oncol. 2003; 69: 91-97
        • International Atomic Energy Agency Dosimetry and Medical Radiation Physics
        • Anderson M.D.
        IROC Houston quality assurance center.
        2013
        • International Atomic Energy Agency
        Quality assurance team for radiation oncology.
        International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna2007
        • International Atomic Energy Agency
        Radiation Protection of Patients. SAFRON.
        2013 (http://rpop.iaea.org/RPOP/RPoP/Modules/login/safron-register.htm)
      7. American Association of Physicists in Medicine - Safety Profile Assessment. 2013. http://spa.aapm.org/.

        • International Atomic Energy Agency
        On-site visits to radiotherapy centres medical physics procedures, quality assurance team for radiation oncology (QUATRO).
        (IAEA-TECDOC-1543) International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna2007