Original paper| Volume 29, ISSUE 2, P196-203, March 2013

Concentration modulated skin marker for radiotherapy treatment planning process

Published:April 04, 2012DOI:


      Background and purpose

      For conformal radiotherapy, it is feasible to achieve high accuracy in contouring the outline of the target volume in treatment planning process. In contouring process, target volume is occasionally defined by means of either surgical clips or skin marker during patient anatomical data acquisition. Treatment planning systems are predicting invalid radiation dose distributions by using surgical clips and skin marker within the patient. Purpose of this study is the production of new skin marker which affects less dose distributions of electron beam.

      Materials and methods

      The influences of lead and commercial markers on dose calculations in a 3D treatment planning systems were investigated in terms of electron beam energy and dose profile depth. Dose deviation with commercial marker was observed to smaller than lead marker. However this dose deviation was still at big value. In order to reduce of this value, barium sulfate suspension and ultrasound gel were mixed with different volumetric ratio. With the purpose of acception the most suitable marker for radiation therapy, obtained new suspensions were investigated in terms of visibility and dose deviation.


      B:G/1:10 marker was determined to cause optimum visibility and the lowest dose deviation on dose calculations in terms of electron beam energy and dose profile depth.


      Appropriate marker, mixture of substances such as barium sulfate suspension and ultrasound gel can be produced. This marker is both ease of usage and practical and economical. Each clinic can prepare marker which is peculiar to suspension with different concentration of substance for specific visibility. But, it should be taken into account resultant dose deviation to beam calculation depending on barium sulfate concentration.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Mijnheer B.J.
        The clinical basis for dosimetric accuracy in radiotherapy.
        in: Faulkner K. Harrison R.M. Radiation incidents. British Institute of Radiology, London1996: 16-20
        • Reft C.
        • Alecu R.
        • Das I.J.
        • Gerbi B.J.
        • Keall P.
        • Lief E.
        • et al.
        Dosimetric considerations for patients with hip prostheses undergoing pelvic irradiation.
        Med Phys. 2003; 30 (Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 63): 1162-1182
        • Wei J.
        • Sandison G.A.
        • Hsi W.-C.
        • Ringor M.
        • Lu X.
        Dosimetric impact of a CT metal artefact suppression algortihm for proton, electron and photon therapies.
        Phys Med Biol. 2006; 51: 5183-5197
        • Hogstrom K.R.
        • Almond P.R.
        Review of electron beam therapy physics.
        Phys Med Biol. 2006; 51: 455-489
        • Wei J.
        • Chen L.
        • Sandison G.A.
        • Liang Y.
        • Lu X.
        X-ray CT high-density artefact suppression in the presence of bones.
        Phys Med Biol. 2004; 49: 5407-5418
        • ICRU
        Radiation dosimetry: electron beams with energies between 1 and 50 MeV.
        (ICRU Report 35) ICRU, BethesdaMD1984
        • IAEA
        Commissioning and quality assurance of computerized treatment planning systems for radiation treatment of cancer.
        (IAEA Technical Reports Series: TRS-430)2004 ([Vienna, Austria])
        • ICRP
        Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: adopted by the Commission in November 1990.
        Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK1991 (pp. 1–201)
        • ICRU
        Determination of dose equivalents resulting from external radiation sources.
        (ICRU Report 39) ICRU, Bethesda MD1985
        • Ramm U.
        • Damrau M.
        • Mose S.
        • Manegold K.-H.
        • Rahl C.G.
        • Böttcher H.-D.
        Influence of CT contrast agents on dose calculations in a 3D treatment planning system.
        Phys Med Biol. 2001; 46: 2631-2635