Original paper| Volume 30, ISSUE 4, P413-418, June 2014

Download started.


The novel application of Benford's second order analysis for monitoring radiation output in interventional radiology

Published:December 09, 2013DOI:


      Benford's law is an empirical observation which predicts the expected frequency of digits in naturally occurring datasets spanning multiple orders of magnitude, with the law having been most successfully applied as an audit tool in accountancy. This study investigated the sensitivity of the technique in identifying system output changes using simulated changes in interventional radiology Dose-Area-Product (DAP) data, with any deviations from Benford's distribution identified using z-statistics.
      The radiation output for interventional radiology X-ray equipment is monitored annually during quality control testing; however, for a considerable portion of the year an increased output of the system, potentially caused by engineering adjustments or spontaneous system faults may go unnoticed, leading to a potential increase in the radiation dose to patients. In normal operation recorded examination radiation outputs vary over multiple orders of magnitude rendering the application of normal statistics ineffective for detecting systematic changes in the output. In this work, the annual DAP datasets complied with Benford's first order law for first, second and combinations of the first and second digits. Further, a continuous ‘rolling’ second order technique was devised for trending simulated changes over shorter timescales. This distribution analysis, the first employment of the method for radiation output trending, detected significant changes simulated on the original data, proving the technique useful in this case. The potential is demonstrated for implementation of this novel analysis for monitoring and identifying change in suitable datasets for the purpose of system process control.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Benford F.
        The law of anomalous numbers.
        Proc Am Philos Soc. 1938; 78: 551-572
        • Newcomb S.
        Note of the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers.
        Am J Math. 1881; 4: 39-40
        • Nigrini M.J.
        A taxpayer compliance application of Benford's law.
        J Am Tax Assoc. 1996; 18: 72-91
        • Hill T.P.
        A statistical derivation of the significant-digit law.
        Stat Sci. 1995; 10: 354-363
        • Buck B.
        • Merchant A.C.
        • Perez S.M.
        An illustration of Benford's first digit law using alpha decay half lives.
        Eur J Phys. 1993; 14: 59-63
        • Wlodarski J.
        Fibonacci and Lucas numbers tend to obey Benford's law.
        Fibonacci Q. 1971; 9: 87-88
        • Brown R.J.C.
        Benford's law and the screening of analytical data: the case of pollutant concentrations in ambient air.
        Analyst. 2005; 130: 1280-1285
        • Docampo S.
        • del Mar Trigo M.
        • Aira M.
        • Cabezudo B.
        • Flores-Moya A.
        Benford's law applied to aerobiological data and its potential as a quality control tool.
        Aerobiologia. 2009; 25: 275-283
        • Mebane Jr., W.R.
        Election forensics: the second-digit Benford's law test and recent American presidential elections.
        in: Alvarez R.M. Hall T.E. Hyde S.D. Election fraud: detecting and deterring electoral manipulation. Brookings Press, Washington DC2008: 161-181
        • Nigrini M.J.
        • Miller S.J.
        Data diagnostics using second-order tests of Benford's law.
        Auditing. 2009; 28: 305-324
        • Durtschi C.
        • Hillison W.
        • Pacini C.
        The effective use of Benford's law to assist in detecting fraud in accounting data.
        J Forensic Account. 2004; 5: 17-43
        • Günnel S.
        • Tödter K.H.
        Does Benford's law hold in economic research and forecasting?.
        Empirica. 2009; 36: 273-292
        • Rauch B.
        • Göttsche M.
        • Brähler G.
        • Engel S.
        Fact and fiction in EU-governmental economic data.
        Ger Econ Rev. 2011; 12: 243-255
      1. European Community Council Directive 97/43/euratom of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure.
        Off J. 1997; L180: 0022-0027
        • American Association of Physicist in Medicine (AAPM)
        The role of a clinical medical physicist in diagnostic radiology.
        (Task Group report 42) American Institute of Physics for the AAPM, New York1994
      2. The Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM). Recommended standards for the routine performance testing of diagnostic X-ray imaging systems. IPEM Report 2005 No. 91. York, UK: IPEM.

        • Balter S.
        • Hopewell J.W.
        • Miller D.L.
        • Wagner L.K.
        • Zelefsky M.J.
        Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients' skin and hair.
        Radiol. 2010; 254: 326-341
        • Karambatsakidou A.
        • Tornvall P.
        • Saleh N.
        • Chouliaras T.
        • Löfberg P.-O.
        • Fransson A.
        Skin dose alarm levels in cardiac angiography procedures: is a single DAP value sufficient?.
        Br J Radiol. 2005; 78: 803-809
        • Miller D.L.
        • Balter S.
        • Cole P.E.
        • Lu H.T.
        • Berenstein A.
        • Albert R.
        • et al.
        Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: The RAD-IR study part II.
        J Vasc Interventional Radiol. 2003; 14: 977-990