Advertisement
Technical Notes| Volume 32, ISSUE 4, P625-630, April 2016

Temporal resolution measurement of 128-slice dual source and 320-row area detector computed tomography scanners in helical acquisition mode using the impulse method

Published:April 04, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.02.015

      Highlights

      • Temporal resolution (TR) of modern CT scanners was analysed using an impulse method.
      • Scan combinations of pitch factor (P) and gantry rotation time (R) were assessed.
      • For 320-row ADCT, TR ≈ R (with P < 1.0), whereas TR ≈ 0.5R (with P > 1.0).
      • For 128-slice DSCT, TR improved with a shorter R and greater P.
      • TR of helical acquisition modes were dependent on not only R but also P.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To analyse the temporal resolution (TR) of modern computed tomography (CT) scanners using the impulse method, and assess the actual maximum TR at respective helical acquisition modes.

      Methods

      To assess the actual TR of helical acquisition modes of a 128-slice dual source CT (DSCT) scanner and a 320-row area detector CT (ADCT) scanner, we assessed the TRs of various acquisition combinations of a pitch factor (P) and gantry rotation time (R).

      Results

      The TR of the helical acquisition modes for the 128-slice DSCT scanner continuously improved with a shorter gantry rotation time and greater pitch factor. However, for the 320-row ADCT scanner, the TR with a pitch factor of <1.0 was almost equal to the gantry rotation time, whereas with pitch factor of >1.0, it was approximately one half of the gantry rotation time. The maximum TR values of single- and dual-source helical acquisition modes for the 128-slice DSCT scanner were 0.138 (R/P = 0.285/1.5) and 0.074 s (R/P = 0.285/3.2), and the maximum TR values of the 64 × 0.5- and 160 × 0.5-mm detector configurations of the helical acquisition modes for the 320-row ADCT scanner were 0.120 (R/P = 0.275/1.375) and 0.195 s (R/P = 0.3/0.6), respectively.

      Conclusion

      Because the TR of a CT scanner is not accurately depicted in the specifications of the individual scanner, appropriate acquisition conditions should be determined based on the actual TR measurement.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Fukuda A.
        • Lin P.J.
        • Matsubara K.
        • Miyati T.
        Measurement of gantry rotation time in modern ct.
        J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014; 15: 4517
        • Taguchi K.
        • Aradate H.
        Algorithm for image reconstruction in multi-slice helical CT.
        Med Phys. 1998; 25: 550-561
        • Hu H.
        Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction.
        Med Phys. 1999; 26: 5-18
        • Schaller S.
        • Flohr T.
        • Klingenbeck K.
        • Krause J.
        • Fuchs T.
        • Kalender W.A.
        Spiral interpolation algorithm for multislice spiral CT – part I: theory.
        IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000; 19: 822-834
        • Chinneck C.D.
        • McJury M.
        • Hounsell A.R.
        The potential for undertaking slow CT using a modern CT scanner.
        Br J Radiol. 2010; 83: 687-693
      1. Toshiba Aquilion ONE operation manual.
        Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan2008
      2. SOMATOM definition flash system owner manual.
        Siemens AG, Healthcare Sector, Forchheim, Germany2009
        • Taguchi K.
        • Anno H.
        High temporal resolution for multislice helical computed tomography.
        Med Phys. 2000; 27: 861-872
        • Polacin A.
        • Kalender W.A.
        • Marchal G.
        Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT.
        Radiology. 1992; 185: 29-35
        • Polacin A.
        • Kalender W.A.
        • Brink J.
        • Vannier M.A.
        Measurement of slice sensitivity profiles in spiral CT.
        Med Phys. 1994; 21: 133-140
        • Ichikawa K.
        • Hara T.
        • Urikura A.
        • Takata T.
        • Ohashi K.
        Assessment of temporal resolution of multi-detector row computed tomography in helical acquisition mode using the impulse method.
        Phys Med. 2015; 31: 374-381
        • Flohr T.G.
        • Leng S.
        • Yu L.
        • Aiimendinger T.
        • Bruder H.
        • Petersilka M.
        • et al.
        Dual-source spiral CT with pitch up to 3.2 and 75 ms temporal resolution: image reconstruction and assessment of image quality.
        Med Phys. 2009; 36: 5641-5653
        • Endo M.
        • Mori S.
        • Kandatsu S.
        • Tanada S.
        • Kondo C.
        Development and performance evaluation of the second model 256-detector row CT.
        Radiol Phys Technol. 2008; 1: 20-26
        • Rasband W.S.
        ImageJ.
        U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA1997–2015 ([http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/])
        • Ertel D.
        • Kröber E.
        • Kyriakou Y.
        • Langner O.
        • Kalender W.A.
        Modulation transfer function-based assessment of temporal resolution: validation for single- and dual-source CT.
        Radiology. 2008; 248: 1013-1017
        • McCollough C.H.
        • Schmidt B.
        • Yu L.
        • Primak A.
        • Ulzheimer S.
        • Bruder H.
        • et al.
        Measurement of temporal resolution in dual source CT.
        Med Phys. 2008; 35: 764-768
        • Roos J.E.
        • Willmann J.K.
        • Weishaupt D.
        • Lachat M.
        • Marincek B.
        • Hilfiker P.R.
        Thoracic aorta: motion artifact reduction with retrospective and prospective electrocardiography-assisted multi-detector row CT.
        Radiology. 2002; 222: 271-277
        • Li Y.
        • Fan Z.
        • Xu L.
        • Yang L.
        • Xin H.
        • Zhang N.
        • et al.
        Prospective ECG-gated 320-row CT angiography of the whole aorta and coronary arteries.
        Eur Radiol. 2012; 22: 2432-2440
        • Nakagawa J.
        • Tasaki O.
        • Watanabe Y.
        • Azuma T.
        • Ohnishi M.
        • Ukai I.
        • et al.
        Reduction of thoracic aorta motion artifact with high-pitch 128-slice dual-source computed tomographic angiography: a historical control study.
        J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013; 37: 755-759
        • Wurstbauer K.
        • Deutschmann H.
        • Kopp P.
        • Sedlmayer F.
        Radiotherapy planning for lung cancer: slow CTs allow the drawing of tighter margins.
        Radiother Oncol. 2005; 75: 165-170
        • Keall P.J.
        • Mageras G.S.
        • Balter J.M.
        • Emery R.S.
        • Forster K.M.
        • Jiang S.B.
        • et al.
        The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76.
        Med Phys. 2006; 33: 3874-3900