Advertisement

Optimal dose and fraction number in SBRT of lung tumours: A radiobiological analysis

Published:January 24, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.12.012

      Highlights

      • The LQ model of cell survival is appropriate for use in TCP modelling of lung SBRT.
      • Uncertainty affects the dose-threshold above which 90% of local control exists.
      • Tumour hypoxia modelling supports the use of 5–8 fractions instead of 3 fractions.

      Abstract

      The efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer for severely hypofractionated schedules is clinically proven. Tumour control probability (TCP) modelling might further optimize prescription dose and number of treatment fractions (n).
      To this end, we will discuss the following controversial questions. Which is the most plausible cell-survival model at doses per fraction (d) as high as 20 Gy? Do clinical data support a dose-response relationship with saturation over some threshold-dose? Given the reduced re-oxygenation for severe hypofractionation, is the inclusion of tumour hypoxia in TCP modelling relevant? Can iso-effective schedules be derived by assuming a homogeneous tumour-cell population with α/β ≈ 10 Gy, or should distinct cell subpopulations, with different α/β values, be taken into account? Is there scope for patient-specific individualization of n?
      Despite the difficulty of providing definite answers to the above questions, reasonable suggestions for lung SBRT can be derived from the literature. The LQ model appears to be the best-fitting model of cell-survival even at such large d, and is therefore the preferred choice for TCP modelling. TCP increases with dose, reaching saturation above 90% local control, but there is still uncertainty on the threshold-dose. In silico simulations accounting for variations in tumour oxygenation are consistent with an improved therapeutic ratio at 5–8 fractions instead of the current 3-fraction reference schedules. Tumour hypoxia modelling might also explain how α/β changes with n, identifying the clonogen subpopulation which determines tumour response. Finally, an optimal patient-specific n can be derived from the planned lung dose distribution.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Timmerman R.
        • Papiez L.
        • McGarry R.
        • Likes L.
        • DesRosiers C.
        • Frost S.
        • et al.
        Extracranial stereotactic radio-ablation. Results of a phase I study in medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer.
        Chest. 2003; 124: 1946-1955
        • Fakiris A.J.
        • McGarry R.
        • Yiannoutsos C.T.
        • Papiez L.
        • Williams M.
        • Henderson M.A.
        • et al.
        Stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small-cell lung carcinoma: four-year results of a prospective phase II study.
        Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 75: 677-682https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.042
        • Palma D.
        • Lagerwaard F.
        • Rodrigues G.
        • Haasbeek C.
        • Senan S.
        Curative treatment of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer in patients with severe COPD: stereotactic radiotherapy outcomes and systematic review.
        Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 82: 1149-1156
        • Videtic G.M.
        • Stephans K.L.
        • Woody N.M.
        • Reddy C.A.
        • Zhuang T.
        • Magnelli A.
        • et al.
        30 Gy or 34 Gy? Comparing 2 single-fraction SBRT dose schedules for stage I medically inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014; 90: 203-208https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.017
        • Kellerer A.M.
        • Rossi H.H.
        The theory of dual radiation action.
        Curr Top Radiat Res. 1972; 8: 85-158
        • Chadwick K.H.
        • Leenhouts H.P.
        A molecular theory of cell survival.
        Phys Med Biol. 1973; 13: 78-87
        • Tobias C.A.
        The repair-misrepair model in radiobiology: comparison to other models.
        Radiat Res Suppl. 1985; 8: S77-S95
        • Curtis S.B.
        Lethal and potentially lethal lesions induced by radiation: a unified repair model.
        Radiat Res. 1986; 106: 252-270
        • Wang J.Z.
        • Huang Z.
        • Lo S.S.
        • Yuh W.T.C.
        • Mayr N.A.
        A generalized linear-quadratic model for radiosurgery, Stereotactic body radiation therapy, and high-dose rate brachyterapy.
        J Sci Transl Med. 2010; 2: 39ra48https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3000864
        • Park C.
        • Papiez L.
        • Zhang S.
        • Story M.
        • Timmerman R.D.
        Universal survival curve and single fraction equivalent dose: useful tools in understanding potency of ablative radiotherapy.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 70: 847-852
        • Guerrero M.
        • Carlone M.
        Mechanistic formulation of a linear-quadratic-linear (LQL) model: split-dose experiments and exponentially decaying sources.
        Med Phys. 2010; 37: 4173-4181
        • Foray N.
        • Monroco C.
        • Marples B.
        • Hendry J.H.
        • Fertil B.
        • Goodhead D.T.
        • et al.
        Repair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in human fbroblasts is consistent with a continuous spectrum of repair probability.
        Int J Radiat Biol. 1998; 74: 551-560
        • Sachs R.K.
        • Hahnfeld P.
        • Brenner D.J.
        Review: the link between low-LET dose-response relations and the underlying kinetics of damage production/repair/misrepair.
        Int J Radiat Biol. 1997; 72: 351-374
        • Joiner M.C.
        • Marples B.
        • Lambin P.
        • Short S.C.
        • Turesson I.
        Low-dose hypersensitivity: current status and possible mechanisms.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001; 49: 379-389
        • Bodgi L.
        • Foray N.
        The nucleo-shuttling of the ATM protein as a basis for a novel theory of radiation response: resolution of the linear-quadratic model.
        Int J Radiat Biol. 2016; 92: 117-131
        • Fertil B.
        • Reydellet I.
        • Deschavanne P.J.
        A benchmark of cell survival models using survival curves for human cells after completion of repair of potentially lethal damage.
        Radiat Res. 1994; 138: 61-69
        • Chapman J.D.
        • Nahum A.E.
        Radiotherapy treatment planning. Linear-quadratic radiobiology.
        978-1-4398-6260-5 CRC Press, Boca Raton (FL, USA)2015
        • Guckenberger M.
        • Klement R.J.
        • Allgäuer M.
        • Dieckmann K.
        • Ernst I.
        • Ganswindt U.
        • et al.
        Applicability of the linear-quadratic formalism for modelling local tumor control probability in high dose per fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer.
        Radiother Oncol. 2013; 109: 13-20
        • Giglioli F.R.
        • Strigari L.
        • Ragona R.
        • et al.
        Lung stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy: a large scale multi-institutional planning comparison for interpreting results of multi-institutional studies.
        Phys Med. 2016; 32: 600-606
        • Esposito M.
        • Maggi G.
        • Marino C.
        • et al.
        Multicentre treatment planning inter-comparison in a national context: the liver stereotactic ablative radiotherapy case.
        Phys Med. 2016; 32: 277-283
        • Astrahan M.
        Some implications of linear-quadratic-linear radiation dose-response with regard to hypofractionation.
        Med Phys. 2008; 35: 4161-4172
        • Shuryek I.
        • Carlson D.J.
        • Brown J.M.
        • Brenner D.J.
        High-dose and fractionation effects in stereotactic radiation therapy: analysis of tumor control data from 2965 patients.
        Radiother Oncol. 2015; 115: 327-334
        • Fowler J.
        21 years of biologically effective dose.
        Br J Radiol. 2010; 83: 554-568
        • Partridge M.
        • Ramos M.
        • Sardaro A.
        • Brada M.
        Dose escalation for non-small cell lung cancer: analysis and modelling of published literature.
        Radiother Oncol. 2011; 99: 6-11
        • Van Baardwijk A.
        • Tomé W.A.
        • van Elmpt W.
        • Bentzen S.M.
        • Wanders R.
        • Houben R.
        • et al.
        Is high-dose stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) overkill? A systematic review.
        Radiother Oncol. 2012; 105: 145-149
        • Metha N.
        • King C.R.
        • Agazaryan N.
        • Steinberg M.
        • Hua B.A.
        • Lee P.
        Stereotactic body radiation therapy and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of biological equivalent dose and local control.
        Pract Rad Oncol. 2012; 2: 288-295
        • Ohri N.
        • Werner-Wasik M.
        • Grills I.S.
        • Belderbos J.
        • Hope A.
        • Yan D.
        • et al.
        Modeling local control after hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy for Stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a report from the Elekta collaborative lung research group.
        Int J Rad Onc Biol Phys. 2012; 84: e379-e384
        • Sobin L.H.
        • Gospodarowicz M.K.
        • Wittekind C.
        TNM classification of malignant tumours.
        7th ed. 978-1-4443-3241-4 Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken (New Jersey, USA)2009
        • Kestin L.
        • Grills I.
        • Guckenberger M.
        • Belderbos J.
        • Hope A.J.
        • Werner-Wasik M.
        • et al.
        Dose–response relationship with clinical outcome for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered via online image guidance.
        Radiother Oncol. 2014; 110: 499-504
        • Guckenberger M.
        • Klement R.J.
        • Allgauer M.
        • Andratschke N.
        • Blanck O.
        • Boda-Heggemann J.
        • et al.
        Local tumor control probability modeling of primary and secondary lung tumors in stereotactic body radiotherapy.
        Radiother Oncol. 2016; 118: 485-491
        • Zaider M.
        • Minerbo G.N.
        Tumour control probability: a formulation applicable to any temporal protocol of dose delivery.
        Phys Med Biol. 2000; 45: 279-293
        • Hill R.P.
        • Bristow R.G.
        • Fyles A.
        • Koritzinsky M.
        • Milosevic M.
        • Wouters B.G.
        Hypoxia and Predicting Radiation Response.
        Semin Radiat Oncol. 2015; 25: 260-272
        • Palcic B.
        • Skarsgard L.D.
        Reduced oxygen enhancement ratio at low doses of ionizing radiation.
        Radiat Res. 1984; 100: 328-339
        • Carlson D.J.
        • Stewart R.D.
        • Semenenko V.A.
        Effects of oxygen on intrinsic radiation sensitivity – a test of the relationship between aerobic and hypoxic linear-quadratic (LQ) model parameters.
        Med Phys. 2006; 33: 3105-3115
        • Daşu A.
        • Toma-Daşu J.
        • Karlsonn M.
        Theoretical simulation of tumour oxygenation and results from acute and chronic hypoxia.
        Phys Med Biol. 2003; 48: 2829-2842
        • Rasey J.S.
        • Koh W.J.
        • Evans M.L.
        • Peterson L.M.
        • Lewellen T.K.
        • Graham M.M.
        • et al.
        Quantifying regional hypoxia in human tumors with positron emission tomography of [18F]fluoromisonidazole: a pretherapy study of 37 patients.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996; 36: 417-428
        • Vera P.
        • Bohn P.
        • Edet-Sanson A.
        • Salles A.
        • Hapdey S.
        • Gardin I.
        • et al.
        Simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET) assessment of metabolism with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG), proliferation with 18F-fluorothymidine (FLT), and hypoxia with 18F-fluoro-misonidazole (F-miso) before and during radiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a pilot study.
        Radiother Oncol. 2011; 98: 109-116
        • Graves E.E.
        • Vilalta M.
        • Cecic I.K.
        • Erler J.T.
        • Tran P.T.
        • Felsher D.
        • et al.
        Hypoxia in models of lung cancer: implications for targeted therapeutics.
        Clin Cancer Res. 2010; 16: 4843-4852https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1206
        • Carlson D.J.
        • Keall P.J.
        • Loo Jr, B.W.
        • Chen Z.J.
        • Brown J.M.
        Hypofractionation results in reduced tumor cell kill compared to conventional fractionation for tumors with regions of hypoxia.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 79: 1188-1195https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.007
        • Lindblom E.
        • Antonovic L.
        • Dasu A.
        • Lax I.
        • Wersäll P.
        • Toma-Dasu I.
        Treatment fractionation for stereotactic radiotherapy of lung tumours: a modelling study of the influence of chronic and acute hypoxia on tumour control probability.
        Radiat Oncol. 2014; 9: 149-158https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-149
        • Fischer J.J.
        • Moulder J.E.
        The steepness of the dose–response curve in radiation therapy: theoretical considerations and experimental results.
        Radiology. 1975; 117: 179-184https://doi.org/10.1148/117.1.179
        • Stavreva N.A.
        • Warkentin B.
        • Stavrev P.V.
        • Fallone B.G.
        Investigating the effect of clonogen resensitization on the tumor response to fractionated external radiotherapy.
        Med Phys. 2005; 32: 720-725
        • Ruggieri R.
        Hypofractionation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): suggestions from modelling both acute and chronic hypoxia.
        Phys Med Biol. 2004; 49: 4811-4823
        • Ruggieri R.
        • Nahum A.E.
        The impact of hypofractionation on simultaneous dose-boosting to hypoxic tumour subvolumes.
        Med Phys. 2006; 33: 4044-4055
        • Ruggieri R.
        • Stavreva N.
        • Naccarato S.
        • Stavrev P.
        Applying a hypoxia-incorporating TCP model to experimental data on rat sarcoma.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 83: 1603-1608https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.015
        • Ruggieri R.
        • Stavreva N.
        • Naccarato S.
        • Stavrev P.
        Computed 88% TCP dose for SBRT of NSCLC from tumour hypoxia modelling.
        Phys Med Biol. 2013; 58: 4611-4620https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/4611
        • Li J.
        • Galvin J.
        • Harrison A.
        • Timmerman R.
        • Yu Y.
        • Xiao Y.
        Dosimetric verification using Monte Carlo calculations for tissue heterogeneity-corrected conformal treatment plans following RTOG 0813 dosimetric criteria for lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy.
        Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 84: 508-513
        • Withers H.R.
        • Thames H.D.
        • Peters L.J.
        A new isoeffect curve for change in dose per fraction.
        Radiat Oncol. 1983; 1: 187-191
        • Myerson R.J.
        Normal tissue dose conformality measures to guide radiotherapy fractionation decisions.
        Med Phys. 2011; 38: 1799-1805
        • Burman C.
        • Kutcher G.J.
        • Emami B.
        • Goitein M.
        Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991; 21: 123-135
        • Hoffmann A.L.
        • Nahum A.E.
        Fractionation in normal tissues: the (α/β)eff concept can account for dose heterogeneity and volume effects.
        Phys Med Biol. 2013; 58: 6897-6914
        • Nahum A.E.
        The radiobiology of hypofractionation.
        Clin Oncol. 2015; 27: 260-269