Advertisement
Original paper| Volume 55, P25-32, November 2018

Download started.

Ok

Novel Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for robotic radiosurgery with multi leaf collimator: Dosimetric evaluation

      Highlights

      • Film was used to assess an MC dose calculator for robotic radiosurgery with an MLC.
      • Within a heterogeneous phantom 91% of pixels pass 2%/1 mm 2D gamma vs. 55% with FSPB.
      • A calculation limitation was identified and fixed. The gamma pass-rate rose to 97%.
      • This demonstrates the value of independent validation for any software solution.
      • The MC algorithm expands the clinical use of robotic radiosurgery with MLC.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      At introduction in 2014, dose calculation for the first MLC on a robotic SRS/SBRT platform was limited to a correction-based Finite-Size Pencil Beam (FSPB) algorithm. We report on the dosimetric accuracy of a novel Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation algorithm for this MLC, included in the Precision™ treatment planning system.

      Methods

      A phantom was built of one slab (5.0 cm) of lung-equivalent material (0.09…0.29 g/cc) enclosed by 3.5 cm (above) and 5 cm (below) slabs of solid water (1.045 g/cc). This was irradiated using rectangular (15.4 × 15.4 mm2 to 53.8 × 53.7 mm2) and two irregular MLC-fields. Radiochromic film (EBT3) was positioned perpendicular to the slabs and parallel to the beam. Calculated dose distributions were compared to film measurements using line scans and 2D gamma analysis.

      Results

      Measured and MC calculated percent depth dose curves showed a characteristic dose drop within the low-density region, which was not correctly reproduced by FSPB. Superior average gamma pass rates (2%/1 mm) were found for MC (91.2 ± 1.5%) compared to FSPB (55.4 ± 2.7%). However, MC calculations exhibited localized anomalies at mass density transitions around 0.15 g/cc, which were traced to a simplification in electron transport. Absence of these anomalies was confirmed in a modified build of the MC engine, which increased gamma pass rates to 96.6 ± 1.2%.

      Conclusions

      The novel MC algorithm greatly improves dosimetric accuracy in heterogeneous tissue, potentially expanding the clinical use of robotic radiosurgery with MLC. In-depth, independent validation is paramount to identify and reduce the residual uncertainties in any software solution.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Dieterich S.
        • Gibbs I.C.
        The CyberKnife in clinical use: current roles, future expectations.
        Front Radiat Ther Oncol. 2011; 43: 181-194
        • Echner G.G.
        • Kilby W.
        • Lee M.
        • Earnst E.
        • Sayeh S.
        • Schlafer A.
        • et al.
        The design, physical properties and clinical utility of an iris collimator for robotic radiosurgery.
        Phys Med Biol. 2009 Sep 21; 54 (Epub 2009 Aug 18): 5359-5380https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/54/18/001
        • Fuerweger C.
        • Prins P.
        • Coskan H.
        • Heijmen B.
        Characteristics and performance evaluation of the first commercial MLC for a robotic delivery system.
        Med Phys. 2015; 42: 3194
        • Asmerom G.
        • Bourne D.
        • Chappelow J.
        • et al.
        The design and physical characterization of a multileaf collimator for robotic radiosurgery.
        Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2016; 2: 17003
        • Jeleń U.
        • Söhn M.
        • Alber M.
        A finite size pencil beam for IMRT dose optimization.
        Phys Med Biol. 2005 Apr 21; 50 (Epub 2005 Apr 6): 1747-1766
        • Rosenwald J.C.
        • Rosenberg I.
        • Shentall G.
        Patient dose computation for photon beams.
        in: Mayles P. Nahum A. Rosenwald J.C. Handbook of Radiotherapy Physics: Theory and Practice. Taylor & Francis, New York2007: 559-586
        • Ma C.M.
        • Li J.S.
        • Deng J.
        • Fan J.
        Implementation of Monte Carlo dose calculation for CyberKnife treatment planning.
        J Phys Conf Ser. 2008; 102012016https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/102/1/012016
      1. AAPM Report No.85, 2004. Tissue inhomogeneity corrections for megavoltage photon beams. Report of Task Group No. 65 of the Radiation Therapy Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

      2. Berger MJ. Monte Carlo calculation of the penetration and diffusion of fast charged particles Methods in Computational Physics. In: Alder B, Fernbach S, Rotenberg M editors. New York: Academic. p.135-215.

        • Metropolis N.
        The beginning of the MC method.
        Los Alamos Sci. 1987; 15: 125-130
        • Brualla L.
        • Rodriguez M.
        • Lallena A.M.
        Monte Carlo systems used for treatment planning and dose verification.
        Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 Apr; 193 (Epub 2016 Nov 25): 243-259https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-016-1075-8
        • Chetty I.J.
        • Curran B.
        • Cygler J.E.
        • DeMarco J.J.
        • Ezzell G.
        • Faddegon B.A.
        • et al.
        AAPM task group report no. 105: Monte Carlo-based treatment planning.
        Med Phys. 2007; 34https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2795842
        • Halvorsen P.H.
        • Cirino E.
        • Das I.J.
        • Garrett J.A.
        • Yang J.
        • Yin F.F.
        • Fairobent L.A.
        AAPM-RSS medical physics practice guideline 9.a. for SRS-SBRT.
        J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017; (Epub 2017 Aug 8): 10-21https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12146
        • Accuray, Inc.
        Physics Essentials Guide.
        Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA2017
        • Chetty I.J.
        • Charland P.M.
        • Tyagi N.
        • McShan D.L.
        • Fraass B.A.
        • Bielajew A.F.
        Photon beam relative dose validation of the DPM Monte Carlo code in lung-equivalent media.
        Med Phys. 2003; 4: 563-573https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1555671
        • Wilcox E.E.
        • Daskalov G.M.
        Accuracy of dose measurements and calculations within and beyond heterogeneous tissues for 6 MV photon fields smaller than 4 cm produced by Cyberknife.
        Med Phys. 2008; 6: 2259-2266
        • Hol M.
        • Marijnissen J.P.A.
        • van der Baan P.
        • Heijmen B.J.M.
        Accuracy of the Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for CyberKnife treatment of small lung lesions.
        Med Phys. 2008; 35: 2953https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2962775
        • Muniruzzaman M.
        • Dooley J.
        • Kilby W.
        • Lee M.Y.
        • Maurer Jr, C.R.
        • Sims C.
        Validation tests for CyberKnife® Monte Carlo dose calculations using heterogeneous phantoms.
        Med Phys. 2008; 35: 2953https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2962776
        • Künzler T.
        • Fotina I.
        • Stock M.
        • Georg D.
        Experimental verification of a commercial Monte Carlo-based dose calculation module for high-energy photon beams.
        Phys Med Biol. 2009 Dec 21; 54 (Epub 2009 Nov 24): 7363-7377https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/54/24/008
        • Fragoso M.
        • Wen N.
        • Kumar S.
        • Liu D.
        • Ryu S.
        • Movsas B.
        • et al.
        Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning.
        Phys Med Biol. 2010 Aug 21; 55 (Epub 2010 Jul 29): 4445-4464https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/16/S02
        • Sharma S.
        • Ott J.
        • Wiliams J.
        • Dickow D.
        Dose calculation accuracy of the Monte Carlo algorithms for CyberKnife compared with other commercially available dose calculation algorithms.
        Med Dosim. 2011; Winter;36 (Epub 2010 Dec 8): 347-350https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2010.09.001
        • Dechambre D.
        • Baart V.
        • Cuchiaro S.
        • Ernst C.
        • Jansen N.
        • Berkovic P.
        • et al.
        Commissioning Monte Carlo algorithm for robotic radiosurgery using cylindrical 3D-array with variable density inserts.
        Phys Med. 2017 Jan; 33 (Epub 2017 Jan 11): 152-158https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.01.005
        • Reynaert N.
        • Demol B.
        • Charoy M.
        • Bouchoucha S.
        • Crop F.
        • Wagner A.
        • et al.
        Clincal implementation of a Monte Carlo based treatment plan QA platform for validation of Cyberknife and Tomotherapy treatments.
        Phys Med. 2016; Oct;; 32: 1225-1237
        • Ojala J.
        • Hyödynmaa S.
        • Barańczyk R.
        • Góra E.
        • Waligórski M.P.
        Performance of two commercial electron beam algorithms over regions close to the lung-mediastinum interface, against Monte Carlo simulation and point dosimetry in virtual and anthropomorphic phantoms.
        Phys Med. 2014 Mar; 30: 147-154
        • Ramani R.
        • Lightstone A.W.
        • Mason D.L.
        • O'Brien P.F.
        The use of radiochromic film in treatment verification of dynamic stereotactic radiosurgery.
        Med Phys. 1994 Mar; 21: 389-392https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597385
        • Zhu X.R.
        • Allen J.J.
        • Shi J.
        • Simon W.E.
        Total scatter factors and tissue maximum ratios for small radiosurgery fields: comparison of diode detectors, a parallel-plate ion chamber, and radiographic film.
        Med Phys. 2000 Mar; 27: 472-477https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598915
        • Paskalev K.A.
        • Seuntjens J.P.
        • Patrocinio H.J.
        • Podgorsak E.B.
        Physical aspects of dynamic stereotactic radiosurgery with very small photon beams (1.5 and 3 mm in diameter).
        Med Phys. 2003 Feb; 30: 111-118
        • Das I.J.
        • Ding G.X.
        • Ahnesjö A.
        Small fields: nonequilibrium radiation dosimetry.
        Med Phys. 2008 Jan; 35: 206-215
        • Wilcox E.E.
        • Daskalov G.M.
        • Lincoln H.
        • Shumway R.C.
        • Kaplan B.M.
        • Colasanto J.M.
        Comparison of planned dose distributions calculated by Monte Carlo and Ray-Trace algorithms for the treatment of lung tumors with cyberknife: a preliminary study in 33 patients.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 May 1; 77 (Epub 2009 Dec 11): 277-284https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.001
        • Sharma S.C.
        • Ott J.T.
        • Williams J.B.
        • Dickow D.
        Clinical implications of adopting Monte Carlo treatment planning for CyberKnife.
        J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010 Jan 29; 11: 3142
        • Dooley J.R.
        • Noll J.M.
        • Kilby W.
        • Fong W.
        • Yeung T.
        • Goggin L.M.
        • et al.
        Monte Carlo for CyberKnife radiosurgery with the InCise Multileaf Collimator.
        Phys Med. 2017; 42: 31
        • van der Voort van Zyp N.C.
        • Hoogeman M.S.
        • van de Water S.
        • Levendag P.C.
        • Van der Holt B.J.
        • Heijmen B.
        • Nuyttens J.J.
        Clinical introduction of Monte Carlo treatment planning: a different prescription dose for non-small cell lung cancer according to tumor location and size.
        Radiother Oncol. 2010; 96 (Epub 2010 Apr 27): 55-60https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2010.04.009
      3. AAPM-RSS Medical Physics Practice Guideline 9.a. for SRS-SBRT. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017;18(5):10–21. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12146. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

      4. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. RTOG 0813 Protocol Information, Seamless phase I/II study of stereotactic lung radiotherapy (SBRT) for early stage, centrally located, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in medically inoperable patients. Philadelphia: RTOG; Jun, 2015. http://www.rtog.org/ClinicalTrials/ProtocolTable/StudyDetails.aspx?study=0813.