Advertisement
Original paper| Volume 60, P127-131, April 2019

Download started.

Ok

Surgeon eye lens dose monitoring in catheterization lab: A multi-center survey

Invited for ECMP 2018 Focus Issue
Published:April 03, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.03.027

      Highlights

      • Cardiologists in catheterization procedures can receive high eye-lens equivalent doses.
      • Individual eye-lens dosimetry is recommended for highly exposed workers.
      • Accurate uncertainty assessment is needed in eye-lens dosimetry.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To perform a multi-centre survey on the eye lens equivalent dose absorbed by primary interventionalist during catheterization procedures, using a personal dosimeter placed close to the eye lens.

      Methods

      15 different cardiologists working in 3 different centers, for a total of 5 operating rooms were enrolled. All of them were provided with a single thermoluminescent dosimeter positioned on the inner side of the temples of eyeglasses. The dose monitoring, performed on a two-months basis, started in 2016 and is still running. All dose measurements were performed by a ISO 17025 standard accredited dosimetry service thus providing certified uncertainties as well. Correlation of eye lens and wrist dose with KAP was also investigated.

      Results

      A total number of 101 eye lens measurements were performed. Annual eye lens dose estimation was obtained for all 15 surgeons (mean, mode, range, standard deviation: 10.8, 8, 4.9–27.3, 5.6  mSv, respectively). Uncertainties on annual eye lens dose estimations ranged between 10% and 20%. No significant correlation was found between eye lens dose and KAP.

      Conclusions

      Cardiologists involved in catheterization procedures may receive annual eye lens doses close to the ICRP 118 dose limit and thus individual monitoring with a dedicated dosimeter should be carried out. Uncertainty assessment play a relevant role in eye lens equivalent dose estimation to ensure not to exceed dose limit.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Vano E.
        • Gonzalez L.
        • Fernández J.M.
        • Haskal Z.J.
        Eye lens exposure to radiation in interventional suites: caution is warranted.
        Radiology. 2008; 248: 945-953https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2482071800
        • Matsubara K.
        • Lertsuwunseri V.
        • Srimahachota S.
        • Krisanachinda A.
        • Tulvatana W.
        • Khambhiphant B.
        • et al.
        Eye lens dosimetry and the study on radiation cataract in interventional cardiologists.
        Phys Med. 2017; 44: 232-235https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.10.007
        • Dauer L.T.
        • Ainsbury E.A.
        • Dynlacht J.
        • Hoel D.
        • Klein B.E.K.
        • Mayer D.
        • et al.
        Guidance on radiation dose limits for the lens of the eye: overview of the recommendations in NCRP Commentary No. 26.
        Int J Radiat Biol. 2017; 93: 1015-1023https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2017.1304669
        • Vano E.
        • Kleiman N.J.
        • Duran A.
        • Romano-Miller M.
        • Rehani M.M.
        Radiation-associated lens opacities in catheterization personnel: results of a survey and direct assessments.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013; 24: 197-204https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2012.10.016
      1. Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2013/59/oj.

      2. Radiation protection instrumentation – Passive integrating dosimetry systems for personal and environmental monitoring of photon and beta radiation. IEC 62387;2012.

      3. Ortiz Lopez P, Dauer LT, Loose R, Martin CJ, Miller DL, Vano E, et al. Occupational Radiological Protection in Interventional Procedures. ICRP Publication 139; 2018 Ann. ICRP 47(2).

        • Perisinakis K.
        • Solomou G.
        • Stratakis J.
        • Damilakis J.
        Data and methods to assess occupational exposure to personnel involved in cardiac catheterization procedures.
        Phys Med. 2016; 32: 386-392https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.02.006
        • Vano E.
        • Sanchez R.M.
        • Fernandez J.M.
        • Bartal G.
        • Canevaro L.
        • Lykawka R.
        • et al.
        A set of patient and staff dose data for validation of Monte Carlo calculations in interventional cardiology.
        Radiat Prot Dosim. 2015; 165: 235-239https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv032
        • Vañó E.
        • Fernández J.M.
        • Sánchez R.M.
        • Dauer L.T.
        Realistic approach to estimate lens doses and cataract radiation risk in cardiology when personal dosimeters have not been regularly used.
        Health Phys. 2013; 105: 330-339https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e318299b5d9
        • Koukorava C.
        • Carinou E.
        • Ferrari P.
        • Krim S.
        • Struelens L.
        Study of the parameters affecting operator doses in interventional radiology using Monte Carlo simulations.
        Radiat Meas. 2011; 46: 1216-1222
        • Pantos I.
        • Koukorava C.
        • Nirgianaki E.
        • Carinou E.
        • Tzanalaridou E.
        • Efstathopoulos E.P.
        • et al.
        Radiation exposure of the operator during cardiac catheter ablation procedures.
        Radiat Prot Dosim. 2012; 150: 306-311
        • Vanhavere F.
        • Carinou E.
        • Domienik J.
        • Donadille L.
        • Ginjaume M.
        • Gualdrini G.
        • et al.
        Measurements of eye lens doses in interventional radiology and cardiology: final results of the ORAMED project.
        Radiat Meas. 2011; 46: 1243-1247
        • Martin C.J.
        Eye lens dosimetry for fluoroscopically guided clinical procedures: practical approaches to protection and dose monitoring.
        Radiat Prot Dosim. 2016; 169: 286-291https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv431
      4. IRSN. La Radiopretection des travailleurs. Institut de Radioprotection, Sureté Nucleaire, Croissy Sur Seine; 2014.

      5. IRSN. Le dosimètre cristallin DOSIRIS. Institut de Radioprotection, Sureté Nucleaire, Croissy Sur Seine; 2014. Available at: http://dosimetre.irsn.fr/fr-fr/Documents/Fiches%20produits/IRSN_Fiche_dosimetre_Cristallin.pdf.

        • Tsapaki V.
        • Balter S.
        • Cousins C.
        • Holmberg O.
        • Miller D.L.
        • Miranda P.
        • et al.
        The International Atomic Energy Agency action plan on radiation protection of patients and staff in interventional procedures: achieving change in practice.
        Phys Med. 2018; 52: 56-64https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.06.634
        • Cantone M.C.
        • Ginjaume M.
        • Miljanic S.
        • Martin C.J.
        • Akahane K.
        • Mpete L.
        • et al.
        Report of IRPA task group on the impact of the eye lens dose limits.
        J Radiol Prot. 2017; 37: 527-550https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aa604b
      6. European Commission. Radiation Protection n. 162 “Criteria for Acceptability of Medical Radiological Equipment used in Diagnostic Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy”; 2012.

      7. International Standard ISO/IEC 17025. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories; 2005.

        • Principi S.
        • Farah J.
        • Ferrari P.
        • Carinou E.
        • Clairand I.
        • Ginjaume M.
        The influence of operator position, height and body orientation on eye lens dose in interventional radiology and cardiology: Monte Carlo simulations versus realistic clinical measurements.
        Phys Med. 2016; 32: 1111-1117https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.08.010
        • Principi S.
        • Ginjaume M.
        • Duch M.A.
        • Sánchez R.M.
        • Fernández J.M.
        • Vano E.
        Influence of dosimeter position for the assessment of eye lens dose during interventional cardiology.
        Radiat Prot Dosim. 2015; 164: 79-83https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncu359
      8. J. Strohmaier, C. Naber. Untersuchungen zur Strahlenexposition der Augenlinse von beruflich strahlenexponiertem Personal. KIT 2017 Abschlussbericht BfS-Vorhaben (FKZ): 3613S40011.

        • Jarvinen H.
        • Farah J.
        • Siiskonen T.
        • Ciraj-Bjelac O.
        • Dabin J.
        • Carinou E.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of setting up generic alert levels for maximum skin dose in fluoroscopically guided procedures.
        Phys Med. 2018; 46: 67-74https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.01.010
        • Acton H.
        • James K.
        • Kavanagh R.G.
        • O'Tuathaigh C.
        • Moloney D.
        • Wyse G.
        • et al.
        Monitoring neurointerventional radiation doses using dose-tracking software: implications for the establishment of local diagnostic reference levels.
        Eur Radiol. 2018; 28: 3669-3675https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5405-3
        • Siiskonen T.
        • Ciraj-Bjelac O.
        • Dabin J.
        • Diklic A.
        • Domienik-Andrzejewska J.
        • Farah J.
        • et al.
        Establishing the European diagnostic reference levels for interventional cardiology.
        Phys Med. 2018; 54: 42-48https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.09.012
        • Jupp T.
        • Kamali-Zonouzi P.
        Eye lens dosimetry within the cardiac catheterization laboratory-are ancillary staff being forgotten?.
        Radiat Prot Dosim. 2018; 178: 185-192https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncx088