Advertisement

Effect of dose rate in hypofractionated radiotherapy

Published:September 06, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.07.005

      Highlights

      • Effect of dose rate on biologically effective dose in hypofractionated regimens can be significant (i.e., >5%).
      • In the case of low dose rate, hypofractionation can lead to a significantly increased BED in the organ at risk.
      • Current study indicates that hypofractionated treatments should be delivered with the highest dose rate available.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To evaluate how dose rate affects radiobiological properties of hypofractionated radiotherapy.

      Methods

      This study is based on the linear-quadratic (LQ) model used to determine biologically effective dose ( BED ). Changes in the biologically effective dose in normal tissue ( BE D nt ) are studied as a function of number of fractions and dose rate under the condition of fixed BED in the treatment target ( BE D tar ) .

      Results

      In this study we demonstrate that compared to standard fractionation, hypofractionation can either decrease or increase BE D nt depending on the average dose rate. In the considered examples, maximum value of BE D nt in the spinal cord varies monotonically with number of fractions ( N f ) when dose rate is sufficiently high so that the corresponding fraction time is much smaller than characteristic repair half-lives for malignant and normal cells. In contrast, in the case of a lower dose rate of 300 MU/min, BE D nt in the cord can vary non-monotonically with N f . In the later case, there exists optimum number of fractions which corresponds to the minimum BE D nt . It is shown that in the case when radiation induced sublethal damage is repaired faster in the target than in the affected organ at risk (OAR), increasing dose rate helps lower BE D nt .

      Conclusion

      We have demonstrated that, as compared to standard fractionation, hypofractionation can either increase or decrease BE D nt in the OAR depending on the utilized dose rate. Consequently, radiobiological assessment of hypofractionation should take into account dose rate as well as repair rates in the target and OAR.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mizuta M.
        • Takao S.
        • Date H.
        • et al.
        A mathematical study to select fractionation regimen based on physical dose distribution and the linear-quadratic model.
        Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 84: 829-833
        • Gay H.A.
        • Jin J.Y.
        • Chang A.J.
        • Ten Haken R.K.
        Utility of normal tissue-to-tumor a/b ratio when evaluating isodoses of isoeffective radiation therapy treatment plans.
        Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 85: e81-e87
        • Unkelbach J.
        • Craft D.
        • Salari E.
        • Ramakrishnan J.
        • Bortfeld T.
        The dependence of optimal fractionation schemes on the spatial dose distribution.
        Phys Med Biol. 2013; 58: 159-167
        • Kuperman V.Y.
        Effect of radiation protraction in hypofractionated radiotherapy.
        Med Phys. 2018; 45: 3442-3448
        • Myerson R.J.
        Normal tissue dose conformality measures to guide radiotherapy fractionation decisions.
        Med Phys. 2011; 38: 1799-1805
        • Barendsen G.W.
        Dose fractionation, dose rate and iso-effect relationships for normal tissue responses.
        Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 1982; 8: 1981-1997
        • Fowler J.F.
        21 years of biologically effective dose.
        Br J Radiol. 2010; 83: 554-568
        • Thames H.D.
        An ‘Incomplete-repair’ model for survival after fractionated and continuous irradiations.
        Int J Rad Biol. 1985; 47: 319-339
        • Dale R.G.
        The application of the linear-quadratic dose-effect equation to fractionated and protracted radiotherapy.
        Br J Radiol. 1985; 58: 515-528
        • Brenner D.J.
        • Hall E.J.
        Conditions for the equivalence of continuous and pulsed low dose rate brachytherapy.
        Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 1991; 20: 181-190
        • Sachs R.K.
        • Hahnfeld P.
        • Brenner D.J.
        The link between low-LET dose-response relations and the underlying kinetics of damage production/repair/misrepair.
        Int J Radiat Biol. 1997; 72: 351-374
        • Lea D.E.
        • Catcheside D.G.
        The mechanism of the induction by radiation of chromosome aberrations in tradescantia.
        J Genet. 1942; 44: 216-245
        • Kuperman V.Y.
        • Spradlin G.S.
        Use of radiation protraction to escalate biologically effective dose to the treatment target.
        Med Phys. 2011; 38: 6553-6660
        • Kuperman V.Y.
        • Spradlin G.S.
        Effect of variable dose rate on biologically effective dose.
        Int J Rad Biol. 2013; 89: 889-897
        • Fowler J.F.
        • Welsh J.S.
        • Howard S.P.
        Loss of biological effect in prolonged fraction delivery.
        Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2004; 59: 242-249
        • Brenner D.J.
        • Armour E.
        • Corry P.
        • Hall E.J.
        Sublethal damage repair times for a late-responding tissue relevant to brachytherapy (and external-beam radiotherapy): implications for new brachytherapy protocols.
        Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 1998; 41: 135-138
        • Bentzen S.M.
        • Harari P.M.
        • Mehta M.P.
        • Tomé W.A.
        Radiation Oncology Advances.
        Springer Science and Business Media, LLC, 2008
        • Ang K.K.
        • Jiang G.L.
        • Guttenberger R.
        • et al.
        Impact of spinal cord repair kinetics on the practice of altered fractionation schedules.
        Radiother Oncol. 1992; 25: 287-294
        • Kuperman V.Y.
        • Ventura A.M.
        • Sommerfeldt M.
        Effect of radiation protraction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy with direct aperture optimization: a phantom study.
        Phys Med Biol. 2008; 53: 3279-3292
        • Guerrero M.
        • Li X.A.
        Extending the linear–quadratic model for large fraction doses pertinent to stereotactic radiotherapy.
        Phys Med Biol. 2004; 49: 4825-4835
        • Kirkpatrick J.P.
        • Meyer J.J.
        • Marks L.B.
        The L-Q model is inappropriate to model high-dose per fraction effects.
        Semin Radiat Oncol. 2008; 18: 240-243
        • Brenner D.J.
        The linear-quadratic model is an appropriate methodology for determining isoeffective doses at large doses per fraction.
        Semin Radiat Oncol. 2008; 18: 234-239
        • Shuryak I.
        • Carlson D.J.
        • Brown J.M.
        • Brenner D.J.
        High-dose and fractionation effects in stereotactic radiation therapy: analysis of tumor control data from 2965 patients.
        Radiother Oncol. 2015; 115: 327-334
        • Carlson D.J.
        • Keall P.J.
        • Loo B.W.
        • Chen Z.J.
        • Brown J.M.
        Hypofractionation results in reduced tumor cell kill compared to conventional fractionation for tumors with regions of hypoxia.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 79: 1188-1195
        • Roberts S.A.
        • Hendry J.H.
        • Swindell R.
        • Wilkinson J.M.
        • Hunter R.D.
        Compensation for changes in dose-rate in radical low-dose-rate brachytherapy: a radiobiological analysis of a randomised clinical trial.
        Radiother Oncol. 2004; 70: 63-74
        • Fowler J.F.
        Is repair of DNA strand break damage from ionizing radiation second-order rather than first-order? A simpler explanation of apparently multiexponential repair.
        Radiat Res. 1999; 152: 124-136
        • Dale R.G.
        • Fowler J.F.
        • Jones B.
        A new incomplete-repair model based on a 'reciprocal-time' pattern of sublethal damage repair.
        Acta Oncol. 1999; 38: 919-929