Technical note| Volume 70, P118-122, February 2020

Download started.


Quality indicators for hyperthermia treatment: Italian survey analysis

Published:January 30, 2020DOI:


      • New specific set of Hyperthermia treatment Quality Indicators are proposed.
      • Three structure, five process and two outcome Quality Indicators set were selected.
      • Average values used as standard reference values of hyperthermia quality indicators have been obtained and proposed.
      • The proposed indicators are available to be investigated and applied by a larger number of the Institutes.



      Nowadays, no Quality Indicators (QI) have been proposed for Hyperthermia treatments. Starting from radiotherapy experience, the aim of this work is to adapt radiotherapy indicators to Hyperthermia and to propose a new specific set of QI in Hyperthermia field.

      Material and methods

      At first, radiotherapy quality indicators published in literature have been adapted to hyperthermia setting. Moreover, new specific indicators for the treatment of hyperthermia have been defined. To obtain the standard reference values of quality indicators, a questionnaire was sent to 7 Italian hyperthermia Institutes with a list of questions on physical and clinical hyperthermia treatment in order to highlight the different therapeutic approaches.


      Three structure, five process and two outcome QI were selected. It has been possible to adapt seven indicators from radiotherapy, while three indicators have been defined as new specific indicators for hyperthermia. Average values used as standard reference values have been obtained and proposed.


      The survey performed on 7 Italian centres allowed to derive the standard reference value for each indicator. The proposed indicators are available to be investigated and applied by a larger number of Institutes in which hyperthermia treatment is performed in order to monitor the operational procedures and to confirm or modify the reference standard value derived for each indicator.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Cionini L.
        • Gardani G.
        • Gabriele P.
        • Magri S.
        • Morosini P.L.
        • Rosi A.
        • et al.
        Quality indicators in radiotherapy.
        Radiother Oncol. 2007; 82: 191-200
        • Albert J.M.
        • Das P.
        Quality assessment in oncology.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 83: 773-781
        • Desch C.E.
        • McNiff K.K.
        • Schneider E.C.
        • Schrag D.
        • McClure J.
        • Lepisto E.
        • et al.
        American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network quality measures.
        J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 3631-3637
        • Hermens R.P.
        • Ouwens M.M.
        • Vonk-Okhuijsen S.Y.
        • van der Wel Y.
        • Tjan-Heijnen V.C.
        • van den Broek L.D.
        • et al.
        Development of quality indicators for diagnosis and treatment of patients with non small cell lung cancer: a first step toward implementing a multidisciplinary, evidence-based guideline.
        Lung Cancer. 2006; 54: 117-124
        • Spencer B.A.
        • Steinberg M.
        • Malin J.
        • Adams J.
        • Litwin M.S.
        Quality-of-care indicators for early-stage prostate cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 1928-1936
        • Hayman J.A.
        Measuring the quality of care in radiation oncology.
        Semin Radiat Oncol. 2008; 18: 201-206
        • Michalski J.M.
        Regulating quality?.
        Pract Radiat Oncol. 2011; 1: 224-225
      1. American Society for Radiation Oncology. NRC staff adopts ASTRO recommendations for medical event definition, [accessed 10 September 2012].

      2. American College of Radiology: Radiation oncology accreditation program,; 2012 [accessed 23 September 2012].

        • Belletti S.
        • Dutreix A.
        • Garavaglia G.
        • Gfirtner H.
        • Haywood J.
        • Jessen K.A.
        • et al.
        Quality assurance in radiotherapy: the importance of medical physics staffing levels. Recommendations from an ESTRO/EFOMP joint task group.
        Radiother Oncol. 1996; 41: 89-94
        • Varma S.
        • Myerson R.
        • Moros E.
        • Taylor M.
        • Straube W.
        • Zoberi I.
        Simultaneous radiotherapy and superficial hyperthermia for high-risk breast carcinoma: a randomised comparison of treatment sequelae in heated versus non-heated sectors of the chest wall hyperthermia.
        Int J Hyperthermia. 2012; 28: 583-590
        • Zagar T.M.
        • Oleson J.R.
        • Vujaskovic Z.
        • Dewhirst M.W.
        • Craciunescu O.I.
        • Blackwell K.L.
        • et al.
        Hyperthermia combined with radiation therapy for superficial breast cancer and chest wall recurrence: a review of the randomised data.
        Int J Hyperthermia. 2010; 26: 612-617
        • Jones E.L.
        • Oleson J.R.
        • Prosnitz L.R.
        • Samulski T.V.
        • Vujaskovic Z.
        • Yu D.
        • et al.
        Randomized trial of hyperthermia and radiation for superficial tumors.
        J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 3079-3085
        • Kouloulias V.
        • Triantopoulou S.
        • Uzunoglou N.
        • Pistevou-Gompaki K.
        • Barich A.
        • Zygogianni A.
        • et al.
        Hyperthermia Is Now Included in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer Recurrences: An Analysis of Existing Data.
        Breast Care (Basel). 2015; 10: 109-116
        • Hand J.W.
        • Lagendijk J.J.
        • Bach Andersen J.
        • Bolomey J.C.
        Quality assurance guidelines for ESHO protocols.
        Int J Hyperthermia. 1989; 5: 421-428
        • Dewhirst M.W.
        • Phillips T.L.
        • Samulski T.V.
        • Stauffer P.
        • Shrivastava P.
        • Paliwal B.
        • et al.
        RTOG quality assurance guidelines for clinical trials using hyperthermia.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990; 18: 1249-1259
        • Dobšíček Trefná H.
        • Crezee J.
        • Schmidt M.
        • Marder D.
        • Lamprecht U.
        • Ehmann M.
        • et al.
        Quality assurance guidelines for superficial hyperthermia clinical trials : II. Technical requirements for heating devices.
        Strahlenther Onkol. 2017; 193: 351-366
        • Gabriele P.
        • Maggio A.
        • Garibaldi E.
        • Bracco C.
        • Delmastro E.
        • Gabriele D.
        • et al.
        Quality indicators in the intensity modulated/image guided radiotherapy era.
        Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016; 108: 52-61
        • Myerson R.J.
        • Moros E.G.
        • Diederich C.J.
        • Haemmerich D.
        • Hurwitz M.D.
        • Hsu I.C.
        • et al.
        Components of a hyperthermia clinic: recommendations for staffing, equipment, and treatment monitoring.
        Int J Hyperthermia. 2014; 30: 1-5
        • Gabriele P.
        • Malinverni G.
        • Bona C.
        • Manfredi M.
        • Delmastro E.
        • Gatti M.
        • et al.
        Are quality indicators for radiotherapy useful in the evaluation of service efficacy in a new based radiotherapy?.
        Tumori. 2006; 9: 496-502
        • Boyle F.M.
        • Robinson E.
        • Dunn S.M.
        • Heinrich P.C.
        Multidisciplinary care in cancer: the fellowship of the ring.
        J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 916-920
        • Sidhom M.A.
        • Poulsen M.G.
        Multidisciplinary care in oncology: medico legal implications of group decisions.
        Lancet Oncol. 2006; 7: 951-954
        • Ruhstaller T.
        • Roe H.
        • Thürlimann B.
        • Nicoll J.J.
        The multidisciplinary meeting: An indispensable aid to communication between different specialities.
        Eur J Cancer. 2006; 42: 2459-2462
        • Bakker A.
        • Holman R.
        • Rodrigues D.B.
        • Dobšíček Trefná H.
        • Stauffer P.R.
        • van Tienhoven G.
        • et al.
        Analysis of clinical data to determine the minimum number of sensors required for adequate skin temperature monitoring of superficial hyperthermia treatments.
        Int J Hyperthermia. 2018; 34: 910-917
        • Kok H.P.
        • Wust P.
        • Stauffer P.R.
        • Bardati F.
        • van Rhoon G.C.
        • Crezee J.
        Current state of the art of regional hyperthermia treatment planning: a review.
        Radiat Oncol. 2015; 10: 196
        • Bellizzi G.G.
        • Drizdal T.
        • van Rhoon G.C.
        • Crocco L.
        • Isernia T.
        • Paulides M.M.
        Predictive value of SAR based quality indicators for head and neck hyperthermia treatment quality.
        Int J Hyperthermia. 2019; 36: 456-465
        • Van Rhoon G.C.
        Is CEM43 still a relevant thermal dose parameter for hyperthermia treatment monitoring?.
        Int J Hyperthermia. 2016; 32: 50-62
        • Huilgol N.G.
        A retrospective analysis of patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiation, hyperthermia, and cetuximab: A brief report of outcome.
        J Cancer Res Ther. 2016; 12: 1164-1166
        • Marta G.N.
        • Hijal T.
        • de Andrade Carvalho H.
        Reirradiation for locally recurrent breast cancer.
        Breast. 2017; 33: 159-165
        • Oldenborg S.
        • Rasch C.R.N.
        • van Os R.
        • Kusumanto Y.H.
        • Oei B.S.
        • Venselaar J.L.
        • et al.
        Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse.
        Strahlenther Onkol. 2018; 194: 206-214