Advertisement

Updating national diagnostic reference levels for interventional cardiology and methodological aspects

Published:February 05, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.01.014

      Highlights

      • New national DRLs are proposed for updating.
      • Some KAP meters required correction between 10 and 35%.
      • There is still a great margin to optimize procedures and reduce patient doses.
      • Including X-ray systems dose settings information helps in the optimization.
      • This approach stresses the role of MPE in optimization.

      Abstract

      The aim of this study is to propose national diagnostic reference levels (DRL) for updating in the field of interventional cardiology and to include technical details to help plan optimization.
      Medical physics experts and interventional cardiologists from 14 hospitals provided patient dose indicators from coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions. Information about X-ray system dose settings and image quality was also provided.
      The dose values from 30,024 procedures and 26 interventional laboratories were recorded. The national DRLs proposed for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions were respectively 39 and 78 Gy·cm2 for air kerma area product (PKA), 530 and 1300 mGy for air kerma at reference point (Ka,r), 6.7 and 15 min of fluoroscopy time and 760 and 1300 cine images. 36% of the KAP meters required correction factors from 10 to 35%. The dose management systems should allow these corrections to be included automatically. The dose per image in cine in reference conditions differed in a factor of 5.5.
      Including X-ray system dose settings in the methodology provides an insight into the differences between hospitals. The DRLs proposed for Spain in this work were similar to those proposed in the last European survey. The poor correlation between X-ray systems dose settings and patient dose indicators highlights that other factors such as operation protocols and complexity may have more impact in patient dose indicators, which allows a wide margin for optimization. Dose reduction technology together with appropriate training programs will be determinant in the future reduction of patient dose indicators.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. ICRP, 2000. Avoidance of Radiation Injuries from Medical Interventional Procedures. ICRP Publication 85. Ann. ICRP 30 (2).

      2. ICRP, 2013. Radiological protection in cardiology. ICRP Publication 120. Ann. ICRP 42(1).

      3. Council directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. Official Journal of the European Union.

      4. ICRP, 2017. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. ICRP Publication 135. Ann. ICRP 46(1).

        • Sánchez R.
        • Vano E.
        • Fernández J.M.
        • Sotil J.
        • Carrera F.
        • Armas J.
        • et al.
        A national programme for patient and staff dose monitoring in interventional cardiology.
        Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011; 147: 57-61
        • Sánchez R.M.
        • Vano E.
        • Fernández J.M.
        • Escaned J.
        • Goicolea J.
        • Pifarré X.
        • DOCCACI Group
        Initial results from a national follow-up program to monitor radiation doses for patients in interventional cardiology.
        Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2014; 67: 63-65
      5. Estimación de las dosis a las poblaciones en España como consecuencia del radiodiagnóstico médico. Alfa J. 28; pp: 12–19.

        • Hart D.
        • Hillier M.C.
        • Wall B.F.
        National reference doses for common radiographic, fluoroscopic and dental X-ray examinations in the UK.
        Br J Radiol. 2009; 82: 1-12
        • Miller D.L.
        • Hilohi C.M.
        • Spelic D.C.
        Patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology in the U.S.: advisory data sets and possible initial values for U.S. reference levels.
        Med Phys. 2012; 39: 6276-6286
        • Bogaert E.
        • Bacher K.
        • Lemmens K.
        • Carlier M.
        • Desmet W.
        • De Wagter X.
        • et al.
        A largescale multicenter study of patient skin doses in interventional cardiology: dose-area product action levels and dose reference levels.
        Br J Radiol. 2009; 82: 303-312
        • Georges J.-L.
        • Belle L.
        • Etard C.
        • Azowa J.-B.
        • Albert F.
        • Pansieri M.
        • et al.
        Radiation doses to patients in interventional coronary procedures – estimation of updated national reference levels by dose audit.
        Radiat Prot Dosim. 2017; 175: 17-25
        • Brnic Z.
        • Krpan T.
        • Faj D.
        • Kubelka D.
        • Popic Ramac J.
        • Posedel D.
        • et al.
        Patient radiation doses in the most common interventional cardiology procedures in Croatia: first results.
        Radiat Prot Dosim. 2010; 138: 180-186
        • Zotova R.
        • Vassileva J.
        • Hristova J.
        • Pirinen M.
        • Järvinen H.
        A national patient dose survey and setting of reference levels for interventional radiology in Bulgaria.
        Eur Radiol. 2012; 22: 1240-1249
        • Simantirakis G.
        • Koukorava C.
        • Kalathaki M.
        • et al.
        Reference levels and patient doses in interventional cardiology procedures in Greece.
        Eur Radiol. 2013; 23: 2324-2332
        • D’Helft C.J.
        • Brennan P.C.
        • Mcgee A.M.
        • et al.
        Potential Irish dose reference levels for cardiac interventional examinations.
        Br J Radiol. 2009; 82: 296-302
        • Samara E.T.
        • Aroua A.
        • De Palma R.
        • et al.
        An audit of diagnostic reference levels in interventional cardiology and radiology: are there differences between academic and nonacademic centres?.
        Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012; 148: 74-82
      6. Diagnostic reference levels in thirty-six European countries. Part 2/2. Radiation protection no. 180. European Commission. 2014.

        • Neofotitou V.
        • Vano E.
        • Padovani R.
        • et al.
        Preliminary reference levels in interventional cardiology.
        Eur Radiol. 2003; 13: 2259-2263
        • Padovani R.
        • Vano E.
        • Trianni A.
        • Bokou C.
        • Bosmans H.
        • Bor D.
        • et al.
        Reference levels at European level for cardiac interventional procedures.
        Radiat Prot Dosim. 2008; 129: 104-107
        • Siiskonen
        • Ciraj-Bjelac
        • Dabin
        • et al.
        Establishing the European diagnostic reference levels for interventional cardiology.
        Phys Med. 2018; 54: 42-48
      7. IEC 60601-2-43. Medical electrical equipment- Part 2-43: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for interventional procedures.

      8. Spanish Association of Medical Physics, Spanish Association of Radiological Protection and Spanish Association of Medical Radiology. Protocolo Español de Control de Calidad de Radiodiagnóstico. 2011 Revision. Madrid. ISBN 13: 978-84-87078-06-4.

        • Lin
        • Schueler
        • Balter
        • et al.
        Accuracy and calibration of integrated radiation output indicators in diagnostic radiology: a report of the AAPM imaging physics committee task group 190.
        Med Phys. 2015; 42: 6815-6829
        • Gislason-Lee
        • Keeble
        • Egleston
        • et al.
        Comprehensive assessment of patient image quality and radiation dose in latest generation cardiac x-ray equipment for percutaneous coronary interventions.
        J Med Imag. 2017; 4025501
        • Kastrati
        • Langenbrink
        • Piatkowski
        • et al.
        Reducing radiation dose in coronary angiography and angioplasty using image noise reduction technology.
        Am J Cardiol. 2016; 118: 353-356
        • Sullivan
        • Harrison
        • Badran
        • Takao
        • Ing
        Reduction in radiation dose in a pediatric cardiac catheterization lab using the philips alluraclarity X-ray system.
        Pediatr Cardiol. 2017; 38: 1583-1591
        • Dekker L.R.
        • et al.
        New image processing and noise reduction technology allows reduction of radiation exposure in complex electrophysiologic interventions while maintaining optimal image quality: a randomized clinical trial.
        Heart Rhythm. 2013; 10: 1678-1682
        • Damen M.
        • van der Tol P.
        • Hernández-Girón I.
        • Geleijns J.
        Analysis of image quality and dose for interventional procedures: allura xper vs clarity.
        Abstracts/Phys Med. 2016; 32: 302
        • Schegerer A.
        • Loose R.
        • Heuser L.J.
        • Brix G.
        Diagnostic reference levels for diagnostic and interventional X-ray procedures in germany: update and handling.
        Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2019; (Epub. Ahead of print)https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0824-7603
        • Järvinen
        • Sierpowska
        • Siiskonen
        • et al.
        Contemporary radiation doses in interventional cardiology: a nationwide study of patient doses in Finland.
        Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2019; (Epub ahead of print)https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncz041