Advertisement

Accurate dosimetric measurement of large extended SSD fields for comparison to TPS models

Published:March 16, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.03.001

      Highlights

      • Accurate measurement of extended source-to-surface distance fields is time consuming.
      • A device was made to accurately and quickly measure large profiles.
      • Treatment Planning System modelling with Monaco was performed.
      • Comparisons to Monaco collapsed cone algorithm agreed well for block phantoms.
      • Feasibility established to investigate planning system agreement for patients.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      There is little evidence in the literature which quantifies the accuracy of Treatment Planning Systems (TPSs) using large fields at extended SSD (eSSD). This paper introduces the approach taken at Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand to validate the use of the Monaco TPS for Total Body Irradiation (TBI) treatments.

      Methods

      A purpose-built device for allowing precise movements of block-like phantoms called a Phantom Mobility Device (PMD) was used for collecting measurements at eSSD. These measurements were used for determining the ability of the Monaco TPS (originally validated for SSDs between 80 and 110 cm) to accurately model dose distributions for TBI treatments at Christchurch Hospital on either treatment machine one (T1) or two (T2) with SSD values of 341 and 432.6 and clinically useful field sizes of 120 and 170 cm, respectively.

      Results

      We found that within the limits of measurement uncertainty the PMD contributed no determinable scatter to the measurements and proved a reliable approach for eSSD dose measurements. Additionally, by applying depth and off-axis distance constraints of use for TPS information it is possible to use the existing Monaco CCC model at eSSD for block phantom geometries. Dose Difference (DD) analysis showed a clinically acceptable agreement between the CCC model and measured data over a range of depths and off-axis distances.

      Conclusions

      The PMD was determined to be a useful tool for accurate measurement of extended SSD treatment fields. Monaco TPS CCC model agreed well for block phantoms so future comparisons to anthropomorphic phantoms or patient data are feasible.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Van Dyk J, Galvin JM, Glasgow GP, and Podgorsak EB. AAPM Report No. 017 – The Physical Aspects of Total and Half Body Photon Irradiation. AAPM 1986. https://doi.org/10.37206/16.

      2. Rusu I. Total body irradiation (TBI). In: Brady LW, Yaeger TE, editors. Encyclopedia of radiation oncology, Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. p. 904–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85516-3_38.

      3. Moggré A, Wilder B. Total body irradiation (TBI) recommissioning report. Christchurch hospital, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand Unpublished Internal Report.

      4. Narayanasamy G, Bosse C, Saenz D, Cruz W, Mavroidis P, Papanikolaou N, Stathakis S. SU-E-T-194: commissioning of monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator. Med Phys 2015; 42:3376–3376. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4924555.

        • Snyder J.E.
        • Hyer D.E.
        • Flynn R.T.
        • Boczkowski A.
        • Wang D.
        The commissioning and validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator.
        J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019; 20: 184-193https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12507
      5. López-Tarjuelo J, García-Mollá R, Juan-Senabre XJ, Quirós-Higueras JD, Santos-Serra A, de Marco-Blancas N, Calzada-Feliu S. Acceptance and commissioning of a treatment planning system based on Monte Carlo calculations. Technol Cancer Res Treatment 2014; 13:129–138. https://doi.org/10.7785/tcrt.2012.500361.

        • Chakarova R.
        • Krantz M.
        A Monte Carlo evaluation of beam characteristics for total body irradiation at extended treatment distances.
        J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014; 15: 4708https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4708
        • Lavallée M.-C.
        • Gingras L.
        • Chrétien M.
        • Aubin S.
        • Côté C.
        • Beaulieu L.
        Commissioning and evaluation of an extended SSD photon model for PINNACLE3: an application to total body irradiation.
        Med Phys. 2009; 36: 3844-3855https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3171688
        • Lamichhane N.
        • Patel V.N.
        • Studenski M.T.
        Going the distance: validation of Acuros and AAA at an extended SSD of 400 cm.
        J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016; 17: 63-73https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5913
        • Narayanasamy G.
        • Saenz D.L.
        • Defoor D.
        • Papanikolaou N.
        • Stathakis S.
        Dosimetric validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator.
        J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017; 18: 123-129https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12188
      6. Phoenix Dosimetry. NE2571 & NE2581 Ionisation Chambers. https://phoenix-dosimetry.co.uk/farmer-ne2581a-ionization-chamber/; 2021 [accessed 10 February 2021].

      7. Moggré A, Wilder B. Total body irradiation protocol. Christchurch Hospital, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand Unpublished Internal Report.

      8. CNMC. UNIDOS E Field-Class Electrometer/Dosimeter. http://www.teambest.com/CNMC_docs/radPhysics/electrometers/CNMC_T10010.pdf; 2019 [accessed 10 April 2019].

      9. Duncan-Gelder P. TBIControl v1.0.0. https://github.com/Phillip-Duncan/TBIControl; 2020 [accessed 28 April 2020].

      10. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2008. http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html.

        • Fraass B.
        • Doppke K.
        • Hunt M.
        • Kutcher G.
        • Starkschall G.
        • Stern R.
        • Van Dyke J.
        American association of physicists in medicine radiation therapy committee task group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning.
        Med Phys. 1998; 25: 1773-1829https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598373