Highlights
- •Artificial intelligence and deep learning-based solutions emerged as promising approaches pertinent to PET and SPECT imaging.
- •Numerous applications in the field are taking advantage of these developments.
- •Successful commercial implementation of deep learning-based solutions is projected.
- •Clinical validation and adoption of these tools face many challenges.
Abstract
Graphical abstract

Keywords
Introduction
Principles of machine learning and deep learning
- Zaidi H.
- El Naqa I.

Applications of deep learning in SPECT and PET imaging
Instrumentation and image acquisition/formation

Image reconstruction and low-dose/fast image acquisition

- Ryden T.
- van Essen M.
- Marin I.
- Svensson J.
- Bernhardt P.
Quantitative imaging
- Mostafapour S.
- Gholamian Khah F.
- Dadgar H.
- ARABI H.
- Zaidi H.

Authors | Modality | Radiotracer | Approach | Algorithm | Body region | Training | Training/Test | Input | Output | Evaluation | Outcome | Loss Function |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liu et al. [84] | PET | 18F-FDG | NAC to sCT | CED | Brain | 2D (200 × 180) | 100/28 | NAC | sCT | 21 VOIs + whole brain | Average PET quantification bias − 0.64 ± 1.99 | L2 |
Armanious et al. [113] | PET | 18F-FDG | NAC to sCT | GAN | Brain | 2D (400 × 400) | 50/40 | NAC | sCT | 7 VOIs + Whole brin | < 5% Average PET quantification bias | Perceptual |
Dong et al. [85] | PET | 18F-FDG | NAC to sCT | Cycle-GAN | Whole-body | Patches (64 × 64 × 16) | 80/39 | NAC | sCT | 7 VOIs in different regions | 0.12% ±2.98% Mean PET quantification bias | Adversarial loss + cycle consistency loss |
Colmeiro et al. [114] Leynes AP, Ahn SP, Wangerin KA, Kaushik SS, Wiesinger F, Hope TA, et al. Bayesian deep learning Uncertainty estimation and pseudo-CT prior for robust Maximum Likelihood estimation of Activity and Attenuation (UpCT-MLAA) in the presence of metal implants for simultaneous PET/MRI in the pelvis. arXiv preprint arXiv:200103414. 2020. | PET | 18F-FDG | NAC to sCT | GAN | Whole-body | 3D(128 × 128 × 32) | 108/10 | NAC | sCT | --- | SUV not reportedMAE 88.9 ± 10.5 HU | |
Shi et al. [86] | SPECT | 99mTc-tetrofosmin | NAC to sCT | GANConditional | Cardiac | 3D (16 × 16 × 16) | 40/25 | Photo peak (126–155 keV) and (114–126 keV) | sCT | Voelwise | NMAE 0.26%±0.15% | L2 + LGDL |
Arabi et al. [89] | PET | 18F-FDG | NAC to ACF | ResNet | Brain | 2D (168 × 200)7 input channels and 1 output channel | 68/4 CV | TOF sinogram bins | attenuation correction factors (ACFs) | 63 brain regions | < 7% absolute PET quantification bias | L2norm |
Hwang et al. [87] | PET | 18F-FP-CIT | MLAA to sCT | CAE andU-Net | Brain | 2D (200 × 200) | 40/5 CV | MLAA-generated activity distribution and μ-map | sCT | 4 VOIs of brain | PET quantification bias ranging from −8% to −4% | L2-norm |
Hwang et al. [88] | PET | 18F-FDG | MLAA to sCT | U-Net | Whole-body | Patches (64 × 64 × 16) | 80/20 | MLAA-generated activity distribution and μ-map | sCT | bone lesions + soft-tissues | PET quantification bias bias% Bone lesions: 2.22 ± 1.77% Soft-tissue lesions: 1.31%± 3.35%) | L1 norm |
Shi et al. [115] | PET | 18F-FDG | MLAA to sCT | U-Net | Whole-body | Patches (32 × 32 × 32) | 80/20 | MLAA-generated activity distribution and μ-map | sCT | Region-wise | NMAE 3.6% | Line-integral projection loss |
Shiri et al. [90] | PET | 18F-FDG | NAC to MAC | U-Net | Brain | 2D (256 × 256) | 111/18 | NAC | AC | 83 VOIs | PET quantification bias − 0.10 ± 2.14% | MSE |
Yang et al. [91] | PET | 18F-FDG | NAC to MAC | U-Net | Brain | 2D (256 × 256) | 25/10 | NAC | AC | 116 VOIs | PET quantification bias 4.0%±15.4% | Meansquared error (or L2 loss) |
Arabi et al. [92] | PET | 18F-FDG18F-DOPA18F-Flortaucipir18F-Flutemetamol | NAC to MAC | ResNet | Brain | 2D (128 × 128) | 180 | NAC | AC | 7 brain regions | < 9% Absolute PET quantification bias | L2norm |
Dong et al. [56] | PET | 18F-FDG | NAC to MAC | Cycle-GAN | Whole-body | Patches (64 × 64 × 64) | 25 leave-one-out + 10 patients × 3 sequential scan tests | NAC | AC | 6 VOIs in lesions | ME 2.85 ± 5.21 | Wasserstein loss |
Shiri et al. [93] | PET | 18F-FDG | NAC to MAC | ResNet | Whole-body | 2D (154 × 154) Patch (64 × 64 × 64) 3D (154 × 154 × 32) | 1000/150 | NAC | AC | Voxelwise and region-wise | RE % < 5% | L2norm |
Xiang et al. [99] | SPECT | 90Y | Input: µ-map + SPECT projections, Output: scatter projections | DCNN (VGG and ResNet) | Chest + Abdomen | 2D (128 × 80) | Phantom +6 patients | Projected attenuation mapSPECT projection | Estimated scatterprojections | Voxelwise | NRMSE 0.41 | MSE |
Nguyen et al. [100] | SPECT | 99mTc | NAC to MAC | 3D Unet-GAN | Cardiac | 3D (90 × 90 × 28) | 1473/336 | NAC | AC | Voxel-wise | NMAE = 0.034 | L2norm and cross-entropy |
Mostafapour et al. [101] | SPECT | 99mTc | NAC to MAC | ResNet | Cardiac | 2D (64 × 64) | 20/80 | NAC | AC | Voxel-wise and clinical | Bias = 0.34 ± 5.03% | L2norm |
Authors | Modality | Radiotracer | Approaches | Algorithm | Organ | Training | Training/Test | Input | Output | Evaluation | Error | Loss Function |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bradshaw et al. [116] | PET | 18F-FDG | MRI to tissue labeling | DeepMedic | Pelvis | Patch (25 × 25 × 25) | 12/6 | T1/T2 | 4-class probability map | 16 soft-tissue lesions | MSE 4.9% | Cross-entropy loss |
Jang et al. [117] | PET | 18F-FDG | MRI to tissue labeling | SegNet | Brain | 2D (340 × 340) | Pretraining: 30 MRI, Training 6 MRIEvaluation: 8 MRI | UTE | sCT | 23 VOIs + whole brain | < 1% | Multi-class soft-max classifier |
Liu et al. [94] | PET | 18F-FDG | MRI to tissue labeling | CED | Brain | 2D (340 × 340) | 30/10 MRI to label 5 PET/MRI | T1-weighted | 3-class probability map | 23 VOIs + whole brain | Average error < 1% inthe whole brain | Cross-entropy |
Arabi et al. [95] | PET | 18F-FDG | MRI to tissue labeling | GAN | Brain | 3D (224 × 224 × 32) | 40 /2 CV | T1 | 3-class probability map | 63 brain regions | <4% | Cross-entropy |
Mecheter et al. [118] | PET | 18F-FDG | MRI to Segment | SegNet | Brain | 2D (256 × 256) | 12/3 | T1/T2 | 3 Tissue | − | − | Cross-entropy |
Leynes et al. [96] | PET | 18F-FDG68Ga-PSMA-11 | MRI to sCT | U-Net | Pelvis | Patch (32 × 32 × 16) | 10/16 | ZTE and Dixon (fat/water)multi-input | sCT | 30 bone lesions and 60 soft-tissue lesions | RMSE 2.68% in bone and 4.07% in soft-tissues | L1-loss, gradient difference loss (GDL), and Laplacian difference loss (LDL) |
Gong et al. [119] | PET | 18F-FDG | MRI to sCT | U-Net | Brain | 2D (144 × 144) | 40 /5 CV | Dixon and ZTE | sCT | 8 VOIs + whole brain | MRE 3% | L1 norm |
Ladefoged et al. [97] | PET | 18F-FET | MRI to sCT | U-Net | Brain | 3D (192 × 192 × 16) | 79/4 CV | UTE | sCT | 36 brain tumor VOIs | Mean relative difference −0.1% | Mean squared-error |
Blanc-Durand et al. [120] | PET | 18F-FDG | MRI to sCT | U-Net | Brain | Patch (64 × 64 × 16) | 23/47 | ZTE | sCT | 70 VOIs + whole brain | Average error −0.2% | Mean squarederror |
Spuhler et al. [121] | PET | 11C-WAY-10063511C-DASB | MRI to sCT | U-Net | Brain | 2D (256 × 256) | 56/11 | T1 | sCT | 20 brain regions (VOIs) | PET quanitifaction error within VOIs −0.49 ± 1.7% 11C-WAY-100635 −1.52 ± 0.73% 11C-DASB | L1 error |
Torrado-Carvajal et al. [122] | PET | 18F-FDG18F-Choline | MRI to sCT | U-Net | Pelvis | 2D (256 × 256) | 28/4 CV | Dixon-VIBE | sCT | Regionwise and voxelwise | < 1% | Mean absolute error |
Gong et al. [123] | PET | 11C-PiB18F-MK6240 | MRI to sCT | U-Net | Brain | 2D (160 × 160)Multichannel input of 5 and 35 | 35/5 CV | 1 UTE imageand 6 multi-echo Dixon with different TEs | sCT | 8 VOIs | < 2% | L1-norm |
Gong et al. [124] | PET | 18F-FDG | MRI to sCT | Cycle-GAN | Brain | Patch (144 × 144 × 25) | 32 /4 CV | Dixon | sCT | 16 VOIs | < 3% | L1-norm loss |
Ladefoged et al. [98] | PET | 18F-FDG | MRI to sCT | U-Net | Brain | 3D (192 × 192 × 16)Multichannel | 732/305 | Dixon VIBET1UTE | sCT | 16 VOIs | < 1% | Mean squared error |
Leynes et al. [125] | PET | 18F-FDG68Ga-PSMA-1168Ga-DOTATATE | MRI to sCT | Bayesian DCNNU-Net | Pelvis | Patch (64 × 64 × 32) | 10/19 | DixonZTE | sCT | ROIs on lesion | < 5% | L1-loss + gradient difference loss (GDL+(Laplacian difference loss |
Pozaruk et al. [126] | PET | 68Ga-PSMA-11 | MRI to sCT | GAN, U-Net | Pelvis | 2D (192 × 128) | 18/10 | Dixon | sCT | ROIs on the prostate | < 3% | mean absolute error |
Tao et al. [127] | PET | Not reported | MRI to sCT | Conditional GAN | Brain | 2D (256 × 256) | 9/2 | ZTE | sCT | Voxel wise | <5% CTHU bias | L1 loss and GAN loss |
Image interpretation and decision support
Image segmentation, registration, and fusion
- Colmeiro R.R.
- Verrastro C.
- Minsky D.
- Grosges T.
- Shi L.
- Onofrey J.A.
- Revilla E.M.
- Toyonaga T.
- Menard D.
- Ankrah J.
- et al.
AI-assisted diagnosis and prognosis
Radiomics and precision medicine
- Edalat-Javid M.
- Shiri I.
- Hajianfar G.
- Abdollahi H.
- Arabi H.
- Oveisi N.
- et al.
Internal radiation dosimetry
- Akhavanallaf A.
- Shiri I.
- Arabi H.
- Zaidi H.

- Akhavanallaf A.
- Shiri I.
- Arabi H.
- Zaidi H.
Challenges/opportunities and outlook
Acknowledgments
References
- Artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine.J Nucl Med. 2019; 60: 29S-37S
- Applications of artificial intelligence and deep learning in molecular imaging and radiotherapy.Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2020; 4: 1-23
- Machine learning in PET: from photon detection to quantitative image reconstruction.Proc IEEE. 2020; 108: 51-68
- Introduction to machine learning.MIT Press, 2020
- Deep learning.Nature. 2015; 521: 436-444
- Machine learning in quantitative PET: a review of attenuation correction and low-count image reconstruction methods.Phys Med. 2020; 76: 294-306
- Deep learning in medical image analysis: challenges and applications.Springer, 2020
- Stacked convolutional auto-encoders for hierarchical feature extraction.in: International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. Springer, 2011: 52-59
- Quantitative molecular positron emission tomography imaging using advanced deep learning techniques.Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2021; 23 (in press)https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-082420-020343
- Going deep in medical image analysis: concepts, methods, challenges, and future directions.IEEE Access. 2019; 7: 99540-99572
- Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation.in: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 2015: 234-241
Oktay O, Schlemper J, Folgoc LL, Lee M, Heinrich M, Misawa K, et al. Attention u-net: Learning where to look for the pancreas. arXiv preprint arXiv:180403999. 2018.
- Resunet-a: a deep learning framework for semantic segmentation of remotely sensed data.ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2020; 162: 94-114
Isola P, Zhu J-Y, Zhou T, Efros AA. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition2017. p. 1125-34.
Zhu J-Y, Park T, Isola P, Efros AA. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision2017. p. 2223-32.
- A novel DOI positioning algorithm for monolithic scintillator crystals in PET based on gradient tree boosting.IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2018; 3: 465-474
- Compton PET: a simulation study for a PET module with novel geometry and machine learning for position decoding.Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2018; 5015018
- Depth of interaction estimation in a preclinical PET scanner equipped with monolithic crystals coupled to SiPMs using a deep neural network.Appl Sci. 2020; 10: 4753
- Gradient tree boosting-based positioning method for monolithic scintillator crystals in positron emission tomography.IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2018; 2: 411-421
- A feasibility study on 3D interaction position estimation using deep neural network in Cherenkov-based detector: a Monte Carlo simulation study.Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2019; 5035001
- Using convolutional neural networks to estimate time-of-flight from PET detector waveforms.Phys Med Biol. 2018; 63 (02LT1)
Gladen R, Chirayath V, Fairchild A, Manry M, Koymen A, Weiss A. Efficient Machine Learning Approach for Optimizing the Timing Resolution of a High Purity Germanium Detector. arXiv preprint arXiv:200400008. 2020.
- FPGA-based accelerators of deep learning networks for learning and classification: a review.IEEE Access. 2018; 7: 7823-7859
- Ultra-low-dose chest CT imaging of COVID-19 patients using a deep residual neural network.Eur Radiol. 2020; 1–12
- DeepPET: A deep encoder–decoder network for directly solving the PET image reconstruction inverse problem.Med Image Anal. 2019; 54: 253-262
- Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning.Nature. 2018; 555: 487-492
- Image reconstruction: from sparsity to data-adaptive methods and machine learning.Proc IEEE. 2019; 108: 86-109
- Deep learning for PET image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma.Med Sci. 2021; 5: 1-25
FDA. 510k Premarket Notification of AiCE Deep Learning Reconstruction (Canon). 2019.
FDA. 510k Premarket Notification of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (GE Medical Systems). 2019.
- Near real-time reconstruction of PET histo-image data using a neural network.IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2021; 5: 65-77
- Non-local mean denoising using multiple PET reconstructions.Ann Nucl Med. 2021; 35: 176-186
- Improvement of image quality in PET using post-reconstruction hybrid spatial-frequency domain filtering.Phys Med Biol. 2018; 63215010
- Spatially guided nonlocal mean approach for denoising of PET images.Med Phys. 2020; 47: 1656-1669
- Postreconstruction nonlocal means filtering of whole-body PET with an anatomical prior.IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014; 33: 636-650
- Advances in PET image reconstruction.PET Clinics. 2007; 2: 173-190
- MRI-guided brain PET image filtering and partial volume correction.Phys Med Biol. 2015; 60: 961
- Semisupervised tripled dictionary learning for standard-dose PET image prediction using low-dose PET and multimodal MRI.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016; 64: 569-579
- Multi-level canonical correlation analysis for standard-dose PET image estimation.IEEE Trans Image Process. 2016; 25: 3303-3315
- Image reconstruction for positron emission tomography based on patch-based regularization and dictionary learning.Med Phys. 2019; 46: 5014-5026
- MR-guided kernel EM reconstruction for reduced dose PET imaging.IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2017; 2: 235-243
- A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis.Med Image Anal. 2017; 42: 60-88
- Ultra-low-dose (18)F-Florbetaben amyloid PET imaging using deep learning with multi-contrast MRI inputs.Radiology. 2019; 290: 649-656
- Deep auto-context convolutional neural networks for standard-dose PET image estimation from low-dose PET/MRI.Neurocomputing. 2017; 267: 406-416
- 3D conditional generative adversarial networks for high-quality PET image estimation at low dose.Neuroimage. 2018; 174: 550-562
- Ultra-low-dose PET reconstruction using generative adversarial network with feature matching and task-specific perceptual loss.Med Phys. 2019; 46: 3555-3564
- Super-resolution PET imaging using convolutional neural networks.IEEE Trans Comput Imaging. 2020; 6: 518-528
- Projection-space implementation of deep learning-guided low-dose brain PET imaging improves performance over implementation in image-space.J Nucl Med. 2020; 61: 1388-1396
Xu J, Gong E, Pauly J, Zaharchuk G. 200x Low-dose PET Reconstruction using Deep Learning. ARXIV. 2017:eprint arXiv:1712.04119.
- Higher SNR PET image prediction using a deep learning model and MRI image.Phys Med Biol. 2019; 64115004
- PET image denoising using unsupervised deep learning.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019; 46: 2780-2789
- An investigation of quantitative accuracy for deep learning based denoising in oncological PET.Phys Med Biol. 2019; 64165019
- Full-dose PET image estimation from low-dose PET image using deep learning: a pilot study.J Digit Imaging. 2019; 32: 773-778
- Supervised learning with CycleGAN for low-dose FDG PET image denoising.Med Image Anal. 2020; 101770
- Whole-body PET estimation from low count statistics using cycle-consistent generative adversarial networks.Phys Med Biol. 2019; 64215017
- Deep learning-based attenuation correction in the absence of structural information for whole-body positron emission tomography imaging.Phys Med Biol. 2020; 65055011
Lu S, Tan J, Gao Y, Shi Y, Liang Z. Prior knowledge driven machine learning approach for PET sinogram data denoising. Medical Imaging 2020: Physics of Medical Imaging: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2020. p. 113124A.
- Enhancing the image quality via transferred deep residual learning of coarse PET sinograms.IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018; 37: 2322-2332
Sanaat A, Shiri I, Arabi H, Mainta I, Nkoulou R, and Zaidi H. Deep learning-assisted ultra-fast/low-dose whole-body PET/CT imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 in press.
- Improving Diagnostic Accuracy in Low-Dose SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging with convolutional denoising networks.IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020; 39: 2893-2903
Shiri I, AmirMozafari Sabet K, Arabi H, Pourkeshavarz M, Teimourian B, Ay MR, et al. Standard SPECT myocardial perfusion estimation from half-time acquisitions using deep convolutional residual neural networks. J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 in press.
Reymann MP, Würfl T, Ritt P, Stimpel B, Cachovan M, Vija AH, et al. U-Net for SPECT Image Denoising. 2019 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC): p. 1–2.
Song C, Yang Y, Wernick MN, Pretorius PH, King MA. Low-Dose Cardiac-Gated SPECT Studies Using a Residual Convolutional Neural Network. In IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019) 2019. p. 653–6.
- Deep learning with noise-to-noise training for denoising in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.Med Phys. 2021; 48: 156-168
- Accelerated SPECT image reconstruction with FBP and an image enhancement convolutional neural network.EJNMMI Phys. 2019; 6: 14
- A learned reconstruction network for SPECT imaging.IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2021; 5: 26-34
- Papanicolas CN. A Reconstruction Method Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network for SPECT Imaging.IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Proceedings (NSS/MIC). 2018; : 1-4
- Reducing scan time of paediatric (99m)Tc-DMSA SPECT via deep learning.Clin Radiol. 2021; 76: 315.e13-315.e20
- Deep learning generation of synthetic intermediate projections improves (177)Lu SPECT images reconstructed with sparsely acquired projections.J Nucl Med. 2021; (in press)https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.245548
- Towards enhanced PET quantification in clinical oncology.Br J Radiol. 2017; 91: 20170508
- Scatter modelling and compensation in emission tomography.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004; 31: 761-782
- Vision 20/20: magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation correction in PET/MRI: challenges, solutions, and opportunities.Med Phys. 2016; 43: 1130-1155
- Magnetic resonance-based attenuation correction and scatter correction in neurological positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging—current status with emerging applications.Front Phys. 2020; 7: 243
- Attenuation correction in emission tomography using the emission data–a review.Med Phys. 2016; 43: 807-832
Arabi H, Zaidi H. Deep learning-based metal artefact reduction in PET/CT imaging. Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb 10.
- Feasibility of deep learning-guided attenuation and scatter correction of whole-body 68Ga-PSMA PET studies in the image domain.Clin Nucl Med. 2021; (in press)https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000003585
- MR-guided joint reconstruction of activity and attenuation in brain PET-MR.NeuroImage. 2017; 162: 276-288
- Joint reconstruction of activity and attenuation in fime-of-flight PET: a quantitative analysis.J Nucl Med. 2018; 59: 1624-1629
- Quantitative analysis of MRI-guided attenuation correction techniques in time-of-flight brain PET/MRI.NeuroImage. 2016; 130: 123-133
- One registration multi-atlas-based pseudo-CT generation for attenuation correction in PET/MRI.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016; 43: 2021-2035
- Atlas-guided generation of pseudo-CT images for MRI-only and hybrid PET-MRI-guided radiotherapy treatment planning.Phys Med Biol. 2016; 61: 6531-6552
- Comparison of atlas-based techniques for whole-body bone segmentation.Med Image Anal. 2017; 36: 98-112
- Truncation compensation and metallic dental implant artefact reduction in PET/MRI attenuation correction using deep learning-based object completion.Phys Med Biol. 2020; 65195002
- A deep learning approach for 18 F-FDG PET attenuation correction.EJNMMI Phys. 2018; 5: 1-15
- Synthetic CT generation from non-attenuation corrected PET images for whole-body PET imaging.Phys Med Biol. 2019; 64215016
- Deep learning-based attenuation map generation for myocardial perfusion SPECT.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020; 47: 2383-2395
- Improving the accuracy of simultaneously reconstructed activity and attenuation maps using deep learning.J Nucl Med. 2018; 59: 1624-1629
- Generation of PET Attenuation Map for Whole-Body Time-of-Flight (18)F-FDG PET/MRI Using a deep neural network trained with simultaneously reconstructed activity and attenuation maps.J Nucl Med. 2019; 60: 1183-1189
- Deep learning-guided estimation of attenuation correction factors from time-of-flight PET emission data.Med Image Anal. 2020; 64101718
- Direct attenuation correction of brain PET images using only emission data via a deep convolutional encoder-decoder (Deep-DAC).Eur Radiol. 2019; 29: 6867-6879
- Joint correction of attenuation and scatter in image space using deep convolutional neural networks for dedicated brain (18)F-FDG PET.Phys Med Biol. 2019; 64075019
- Deep learning-guided joint attenuation and scatter correction in multitracer neuroimaging studies.Hum Brain Mapp. 2020; 41: 3667-3679
- Deep-JASC: joint attenuation and scatter correction in whole-body (18)F-FDG PET using a deep residual network.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020; 47: 2533-2548
- Deep learning MR imaging-based attenuation correction for PET/MR imaging.Radiology. 2018; 286: 676-684
- Novel adversarial semantic structure deep learning for MRI-guided attenuation correction in brain PET/MRI.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019; 46: 2746-2759
- Zero-Echo-Time and Dixon Deep Pseudo-CT (ZeDD CT): Direct Generation of Pseudo-CT Images for Pelvic PET/MRI attenuation correction using deep convolutional neural networks with multiparametric MRI.J Nucl Med. 2018; 59: 852-858
- Deep learning based attenuation correction of PET/MRI in pediatric brain tumor patients: evaluation in a clinical setting.Front Neurosci. 2018; 12: 1005
- AI-driven attenuation correction for brain PET/MRI: clinical evaluation of a dementia cohort and importance of the training group size.NeuroImage. 2020; 222117221
- A deep neural network for fast and accurate scatter estimation in quantitative SPECT/CT under challenging scatter conditions.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020; 47: 2956-2967
- 3D Unet Generative Adversarial Network for Attenuation Correction of SPECT Images. IEEE, 2020: 93-97
Mostafapour S, Gholamiankhah F, Maroofpour S, Momennezhad M, Asadinezhad M, Zakavi SR, et al. Deep learning-based attenuation correction in the image domain for myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging. arXiv preprint arXiv:210204915. 2021.
- Independent brain (18)F-FDG PET attenuation correction using a deep learning approach with Generative Adversarial Networks.Hellenic J Nucl Med. 2019; 22: 179-186
- Whole Body Positron Emission Tomography Attenuation Correction Map Synthesizing using 3D Deep Generative Adversarial Networks.Research Square. 2020; https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-46953/v1
- A novel loss function incorporating imaging acquisition physics for PET attenuation map generation using deep learning.in: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 2019: 723-731
- Feasibility of Deep Learning-Based PET/MR attenuation correction in the pelvis using only diagnostic MR images.Tomography. 2018; 4: 138-147
- Technical Note: deep learning based MRAC using rapid ultrashort echo time imaging.Med Phys. 2018; 45: 3697-3704
Mecheter I, Amira A, Abbod M, Zaidi H. Brain MR Imaging Segmentation Using Convolutional Auto Encoder Network for PET Attenuation Correction. In Proceedings of SAI Intelligent Systems Conference: Springer; 2020. p. 430-40.
- Attenuation correction for brain PET imaging using deep neural network based on Dixon and ZTE MR images.Phys Med Biol. 2018; 63125011
- Attenuation correction using 3D deep convolutional neural network for brain 18F-FDG PET/MR: comparison with Atlas, ZTE and CT based attenuation correction.PLoS One. 2019; 14e0223141
- Synthesis of Patient-Specific Transmission Data for PET Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI neuroimaging using a convolutional neural network.J Nucl Med. 2019; 60: 555-560
- Dixon-VIBE Deep Learning (DIVIDE) Pseudo-CT Synthesis for Pelvis PET/MR Attenuation Correction.J Nucl Med. 2019; 60: 429-435
- Attenuation correction using deep Learning and integrated UTE/multi-echo Dixon sequence: evaluation in amyloid and tau PET imaging.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021; (in press)
- MR-based attenuation correction for brain PET using 3D cycle-consistent adversarial network.IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2021; 5: 185-192
Leynes AP, Ahn SP, Wangerin KA, Kaushik SS, Wiesinger F, Hope TA, et al. Bayesian deep learning Uncertainty estimation and pseudo-CT prior for robust Maximum Likelihood estimation of Activity and Attenuation (UpCT-MLAA) in the presence of metal implants for simultaneous PET/MRI in the pelvis. arXiv preprint arXiv:200103414. 2020.
- Augmented deep learning model for improved quantitative accuracy of MR-based PET attenuation correction in PSMA PET-MRI prostate imaging.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021; 48: 9-20
- Pseudo CT Image Synthesis and Bone Segmentation from MR images using adversarial networks with residual blocks for MR-based attenuation correction of brain PET Data.IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2021; 5: 193-201
- Multimodal medical image fusion based on deep learning neural network for clinical treatment analysis.Int J ChemTech Res. 2018; 11: 160-176
- Adaptive template generation for amyloid PET using a deep learning approach.Hum Brain Mapp. 2018; 39: 3769-3778
- Fully automated delineation of gross tumor volume for head and neck cancer on PET-CT using deep learning: a dual-center study.Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging. 2018; : 8923028
- Joint tumor segmentation in PET-CT images using co-clustering and fusion based on belief functions.IEEE Trans Image Process. 2018; 28: 755-766
- Tumor co-segmentation in PET/CT using multi-modality fully convolutional neural network.Phys Med Biol. 2018; 64015011
- Automatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma segmentation using fully convolutional networks with auxiliary paths on dual-modality PET-CT images.J Digit Imaging. 2019; 32: 462-470
- Automatic lesion detection and segmentation of 18F-FET PET in gliomas: a full 3D U-Net convolutional neural network study.PLoS One. 2018; 13e0195798
- A physics-guided modular deep-learning based automated framework for tumor segmentation in PET.Phys Med Biol. 2020; 65: 245032
- A learning-based automatic segmentation method on left ventricle in SPECT imaging. Medical Imaging Biomedical Applications in Molecular, Structural, and Functional Imaging.International Society for Optics and Photonics. 2019; : 109531M
- Quantifying brain [18 F] FDG uptake noninvasively by combining medical health records and dynamic PET imaging data.IEEE J Biomed Health Inf. 2019; 23: 2576-2582
- Measurement of glomerular filtration rate using quantitative SPECT/CT and deep-learning-based kidney segmentation.Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 1-8
- Artificial intelligence, machine (deep) learning and radio (geno) mics: definitions and nuclear medicine imaging applications.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019; 1–8
- Comparison of machine learning methods for classifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer from 18 F-FDG PET/CT images.EJNMMI Res. 2017; 7: 11
- AI and machine learning in nuclear medicine: future perspectives.Sem Nucl Med. 51. 2021: 170-177
- Automated whole-body bone lesion detection for multiple myeloma on 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT imaging using deep learning methods.Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging. 2018; 2391925
- Cardiac sarcoidosis classification with deep convolutional neural network-based features using polar maps.Comput Biol Med. 2019; 104: 81-86
- Thyroid diagnosis from SPECT images using convolutional neural network with optimization.Comput Intelligence Neurosci. 2019; : 6212759
Duffy IR, Boyle AJ, Vasdev N. Improving PET Imaging Acquisition and Analysis With Machine Learning: A Narrative Review With Focus on Alzheimer's Disease and Oncology. Molecular imaging. 2019;18:1536012119869070.
- Multimodal and multiscale deep neural networks for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease using structural MR and FDG-PET images.Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 1-13
- Predicting cognitive decline with deep learning of brain metabolism and amyloid imaging.Behav Brain Res. 2018; 344: 103-109
- Initiative AsDN. Classification of Alzheimer’s disease by combination of convolutional and recurrent neural networks using FDG-PET images.Front Neuroinf. 2018; 12: 35
- Initiative AsDN. Multi-modality cascaded convolutional neural networks for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis.Neuroinformatics. 2018; 16: 295-308
- Effective feature learning and fusion of multimodality data using stage-wise deep neural network for dementia diagnosis.Hum Brain Mapp. 2019; 40: 1001-1016
- Deep learning for prediction of obstructive disease from fast myocardial perfusion SPECT: a multicenter study.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018; 11: 1654-1663
- A learning-based automatic segmentation and quantification method on left ventricle in gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging: a feasibility study.J Nucl Cardiol. 2020; 27: 976-987
- An easy-to-use deep-learning model for highly accurate diagnosis of Parkinson's disease using SPECT images.Comput Med Imaging Graphics. 2021; 87101810
- From handcrafted to deep-learning-based cancer radiomics: challenges and opportunities.IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2019; 36: 132-160
- Van Velden FH. Nuclear medicine radiomics in precision medicine: why we can’t do without artificial intelligence.Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020; 64: 278-290
- Predictive power of a radiomic signature based on 18F-FDG PET/CT images for EGFR mutational status in NSCLC.Front Oncol. 2019; 9: 1062
- Next-generation radiogenomics sequencing for prediction of EGFR and KRAS mutation status in NSCLC patients using multimodal imaging and machine learning algorithms.Mol Imag Biol. 2020; 1–17
- Cardiac SPECT radiomic features repeatability and reproducibility: A multi-scanner phantom study.J Nucl Cardiol. 2021; (in press)https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02109-0
- Delta-radiomics features for the prediction of patient outcomes in non–small cell lung cancer.Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 1-11
- Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics predict local recurrence in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a multicentric study.J Nucl Med. 2020; 61: 814-820
- Bone Marrow and tumor radiomics at 18F-FDG PET/CT: impact on outcome prediction in non-small cell lung cancer.Radiology. 2019; 293: 451-459
- Comparison of tumor uptake heterogeneity characterization between static and parametric 18F-FDG PET images in non-small cell lung cancer.J Nucl Med. 2016; 57: 1033-1039
- Radiomics analysis of clinical myocardial perfusion SPECT to predict coronary artery calcification.J Nucl Med. 2018; 59: 512
- Improved prediction of outcome in Parkinson's disease using radiomics analysis of longitudinal DAT SPECT images.NeuroImage: Clin. 2017; 16: 539-544
- Predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PET imaging using convolutional neural networks.PLoS One. 2015; 10e0137036
- Quantitative imaging for targeted radionuclide therapy dosimetry-technical review.Theranostics. 2017; 7: 4551
- A method of rapid quantification of patient-specific organ doses for CT using deep-learning-based multi-organ segmentation and GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo dose computing.Med Phys. 2020; 47: 2526-2536
- Estimation of the radiation dose in pregnancy: an automated patient-specific model using convolutional neural networks.Eur Radiol. 2019; 29: 6805-6815
- Deep learning-enabled multi-organ segmentation in whole-body mouse scans.Nat Commun. 2020; 11: 1-14
Fu W, Sharma S, Abadi E, Iliopoulos A-S, Wang Q, Lo JY, et al. iPhantom: a framework for automated creation of individualized computational phantoms and its application to CT organ dosimetry. arXiv preprint arXiv:200808730. 2020.
- Deep learning renal segmentation for fully automated radiation dose estimation in unsealed source therapy.Front Oncol. 2018; 8: 215
- Whole liver segmentation based on deep learning and manual adjustment for clinical use in SIRT.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020; 47: 2742-2752
- Deep learning-based SPECT/CT quantification of 177Lu uptake in the kidneys.J Nucl Med. 2020; 61: 1401
- Whole-body voxel-based internal dosimetry using deep learning.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021; (in press)https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05013-4
- Deep-dose: a voxel dose estimation method using deep convolutional neural network for personalized internal dosimetry.Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 1-9
- A deep learning approach to radiation dose estimation.Phys Med Biol. 2020; 65035007
- Dose voxel kernel prediction with neural networks for radiation dose estimation.Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik. 2021; 31: 23-36
- Voxel-wise Prediction of Post-therapy Dosimetry for 177Lu-PSMA I&T Therapy using Deep Learning.J Nucl Med. 2020; 61: 1424
- Personalized 177 Lu-octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumours: a simulation study.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017; 44: 1490-1500