Advertisement

The growing potential of diagnostic reference levels as a dynamic tool for dose optimization

Published:March 20, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.03.018

      Highlights

      • DRLs should be a dynamic tool that follows the development of clinical practice.
      • A standardised approach is needed to facilitate the establishment and use of DRLs.
      • Dose monitoring systems can improve the cycle of establishing, updating and using DRLs.

      Abstract

      Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) is an important tool that can improve radiation safety in medical imaging. However, there are certain aspects that need improvement and several obstacles that should be overcome before DRLs are fully implemented in practice. It is the authors belief that DRLs should be a dynamic tool that follows the development of clinical practice and technology advances. The establishment of adult and paediatric DRLs based on clinical indications should be considered as a priority. A common methodology and terminology is needed to allow for their clinical use. Dose monitoring systems can improve and accelerate the establishment, update and use of DRLs. However, certain steps need to be taken for proper collection. organization and analysis of big data. Availability of clinically qualified medical physicists in medical imaging departments, awareness on the importance of dose optimization and proper cooperation of relevant stakeholders are important prerequisites for the successful establishment and use of DRLs.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. International Commission of Radiological Protection. Radiological Protection and Safety in Medicine. ICRP Publication 73. Ann. ICRP 26 (2), 1996.

      2. International Commission on Radiological Protection, Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging. Publication 135. Ann. ICRP, 46 (1), SAGE, 2017.

      3. International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, IAEA Safety Series No. GSR Part 3, IAEA, Vienna, 2014.

      4. International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation Protection and Safety in Medical Uses of Ionizing Radiation, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-46, IAEA, Vienna, 2018.

        • European Union
        Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom on laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom.
        Off. J. Eur. Union L. 2014; 13: 1-73
        • Hart D.
        • Hillier M.C.
        • Shrimpton P.C.
        Doses to Patients from Radiographic and Fluoroscopic X-ray Imaging Procedures in the UK – 2010 Review Report, HPA-CRCE-034.
        HPA, Chilton2012
        • Shrimpton P.C.
        • Jansen J.T.M.
        • Harrison J.D.
        Updated estimates of typical effective doses for common CT examinations in the UK following the 2011 national review.
        BJR. 2016; 89: 20150346https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150346
        • Roch P.
        • Célier D.
        • Dessaud C.
        • Etard C.
        • Rehani M.M.
        Long-term experience and analysis of data on diagnostic reference levels: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
        Eur Radiol. 2020; 30: 1127-1136
        • Järvinen H.
        • Vassileva J.
        • Samei E.
        • Wallace A.
        • Vano E.
        • Rehani M.
        Patient dose monitoring and the use of diagnostic reference levels for the optimization of protection in medical imaging: current status and challenges worldwide.
        J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017; 4: 1https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.031214
        • Rehani M.M.
        Limitations of diagnostic reference level (DRL) and introduction of acceptable quality dose (AQD).
        Br J Radiol. 2015; 88: 20140344https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140344
        • Awad M.F.
        • Karout L.
        • Arnous G.
        • Rawashdeh M.A.
        • Hneiny L.
        • Saade C.
        A systematic review on the current status of adult diagnostic reference levels in head, chest and abdominopelvic computed tomography.
        J Radiol Prot. 2020; 40: R71-R98
        • Dundara Debeljuh D.
        • Jurković S.
        • Pribanić I.
        • Poljak F.
        • Kralik I.
        • Krstonošić B.
        • et al.
        National survey to set diagnostic reference levels in nuclear medicine single photon emission imaging in Croatia.
        Phys Med. 2020; 78: 109-116
        • Sánchez R.
        • Vañó E.
        • Fernández Soto J.M.
        • Ten J.I.
        • Escaned J.
        • Delgado C.
        • et al.
        Updating national diagnostic reference levels for interventional cardiology and methodological aspects.
        Phys Med. 2020; 70: 169-175
        • Salama D.H.
        • Vassileva J.
        • Mahdaly G.
        • Shawki M.
        • Salama A.
        • Gilley D.
        • et al.
        Establishing national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for computed tomography in Egypt.
        Phys Med. 2017; 39: 16-24
        • Tsapaki V.
        • Delinikolas P.
        • Paraskeva K.
        • et al.
        Preliminary diagnostic reference levels for endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in Greece.
        Phys Med. 2016; 32: 607-611
        • Etard C.
        • Bigand E.
        • Salvat C.
        • Vidal V.
        • Beregi J.P.
        • Hornbeck A.
        • et al.
        Patient dose in interventional radiology: a multicentre study of the most frequent procedures in France.
        Eur Radiol. 2017; 27: 4281-4290
        • Greffier J.
        • Ferretti G.
        • Rousseau J.
        • Andreani O.
        • Alonso E.
        • Rauch A.
        • et al.
        National dose reference levels in computed tomography-guided interventional procedures-a proposal.
        Eur Radiol. 2020; 30: 5690-5701
        • Paulo G.
        • Damilakis J.
        • Tsapaki V.
        • Schegerer A.A.
        • Repussard J.
        • Jaschke W.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography: a literature review.
        Insights Imaging. 2020; 11https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00899-y
        • Lajunen A.
        Indication-based diagnostic reference levels for adult CT-examinations in Finland.
        Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015; 165: 95-97
        • Habib Geryes B.
        • Hornbeck A.
        • Jarrige V.
        • Pierrat N.
        • Ducou Le Pointe H.
        • Dreuil S.
        Patient dose evaluation in computed tomography: a French national study based on clinical indications.
        Phys Med. 2019; 61: 18-27
        • AlNaemi H.
        • Tsapaki V.
        • Omar A.J.
        • AlKuwari M.
        • AlObadli A.
        • Alkhazzam S.
        • et al.
        Towards establishment of diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indication in the state of Qatar.
        Eur J Radiol Open. 2020; 7: 100282https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100282
      5. Tsapaki V, Damilakis J, Paulo G et al, CT diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications: results of a large-scale European survey. Eur Radiol 2021, Jan 15, doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07652-5.

        • De Monte F.
        • Castaldi B.
        • Branchini M.
        • Bettinelli A.
        • Milanesi O.
        • Paiusco M.
        • et al.
        Typical values for pediatric interventional cardiology catheterizations: a standardized approach towards Diagnostic Reference Level establishment.
        Phys Med. 2020; 76: 134-141
        • Morcillo A.B.
        • Alejo L.
        • Huerga C.
        • Bayón J.
        • Obesso A.
        • Corredoira E.
        • et al.
        Local diagnostic reference levels for paediatric non-cardiac interventional radiology procedures.
        Phys Med. 2020; 72: 1-6
      6. European Commission. European Guidelines on Diagnostic Reference Levels for Paediatric Imaging, Radiation Protection No. 185, Directorate-General for Energy, Luxemburg; 2018.

        • Goske M.J.
        • Strauss K.J.
        • Coombs L.P.
        • Mandel K.E.
        • Towbin A.J.
        • Larson D.B.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic reference ranges for pediatric abdominal CT.
        Radiology. 2013; 268: 208-218
        • Järvinen H.
        • Seuri R.
        • Kortesniemi M.
        • Lajunen A.
        • Hallinen E.
        • Savikurki-Heikkilä P.
        • et al.
        Indication-based national diagnostic reference levels for paediatric CT: a new approach with proposed values.
        Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015; 165: 86-90
        • Kanal K.M.
        • Butler P.F.
        • Sengupta D.
        • Bhargavan-Chatfield M.
        • Coombs L.P.
        • Morin R.L.
        U.S. diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations.
        Radiology. 2017; 284: 120-133
      7. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations, The Report of AAPM Task Group 204. AAPM; 2011.

        • Damilakis J.
        CT dosimetry: What has been achieved and what remains to be done.
        Invest Radiol. 2021; 56: 62-68
        • International Atomic Energy Agency
        Patient Dose Optimization in Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures, IAEA-TECDOC-1641.
        IAEA, Vienna2010
        • Alessio A.M.
        • Farrell M.B.
        • Fahey F.H.
        Role of reference levels in nuclear medicine: a report of the SNMMI Dose Optimization Task Force.
        J Nucl Med. 2015; 56: 1960-1964