Advertisement

Assessment of total annual effective doses to representative person, for authorised and accidental releases from the Nuclear Medicine Department at Cattinara Hospital (Trieste, Italy)

Published:September 20, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.09.001

      Highlights

      • Liquid and solid waste management in Trieste Nuclear Medicine Department.
      • Advanced screening models to assess discharged radioactivity into environment.
      • Effective dose exposure to individuals according to Directive 2013/59/EURATOM.
      • Assessing compliance with Italian Legislative Decree 101/2020.
      • Accidental fire event in Radiopharmacy Laboratories simulated by HotSpot software.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      Clinical procedures in a Nuclear Medicine Department produce radioactive liquid and solid waste. Regarding waste release into the environment from an authorised hospital, it is mandatory to verify the compliance with European Directive 2013/59/EURATOM, adopted by the Italian Government via the Legislative Decree 101/2020.

      Methods

      Different activity release pathways into the environment from Trieste Nuclear Medicine Department have been analysed: liquid waste from patients’ excreta discharged by sewage treatment system into the sea, and atmospheric releases following solid waste incineration. Reference models, provided by NCRP and IAEA guidelines, have been implemented to assess the impact of the discharged radioactivity for coastal waters and atmospheric transport conditions. Finally, an accidental fire event occurring in Radiopharmacy Laboratories has been simulated by HotSpot software.

      Results

      Advanced screening models give an effective dose to population of 5.3 · 10−3 µSv/y and 1.4 · 10−4 µSv/y for introduction by sewage system into coastal waters and atmospheric releases by the incinerator, respectively. Workers involved in the maintenance of the sewage treatment plant receive a total annual effective dose of 3.8 µSv/y, while for incinerator staff the total annual exposure is 5.9 · 10−8 µSv/y. For the accidental fire event the maximum total effective dose to an individual results 3.8 · 10−8 Sv with mild wind, and 4.1 · 10−7 Sv with strong wind.

      Conclusions

      The total annual effective doses estimated to representative person, due to both Nuclear Medicine authorised clinical practices and in case of an accidental fire event, are in compliance with regulatory stipulations provided by Directives.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References:

        • Ravichandran R.
        • Binukumar J.P.
        • Sreeram R.
        • Arunkumar L.S.
        An overview of radioactive waste disposal procedures of a nuclear medicine department.
        J Med Phys. 2011; 36: 95-99
      1. Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 05/12/2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. Official Journal of the European Union 17/01/2014: No. L 13.

        • Petrucci C.
        • Traino C.
        Focus on the legislative approach to short half life radioactive hospital waste releasing.
        Eur J Med Phys. 2015; 31: 726-732https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.06.001
      2. Decreto Legislativo 31/07/2020 No. 101. Attuazione della direttiva 2013/59/Euratom, che stabilisce norme fondamentali di sicurezza relative alla protezione contro i pericoli derivanti dall’esposizione alle radiazioni ionizzanti, e che abroga le direttive 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom e 2003/122/Euratom e riordino della normativa di settore in attuazione dell’articolo 20, comma 1, lettera a), della legge 4 ottobre 2019, n. 117. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana 12/08/2020: No. 201; N. 29/L. Last amendment in Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana 01/06/2021: No. 130.

      3. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Assessing Dose of the Representative Person for the Purpose of the Radiation Protection of the Public. Publication 101a Ann ICRP 2006;36(3).

      4. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals: A Compendium of Current Information Related to Frequently Used Substances. Publication 128 Ann ICRP 2015;44(2S).

      5. Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Modalità di valutazione della dose assorbita dall’individuo rappresentativo della popolazione a seguito dello svolgimento di attività di Medicina Nucleare. Report Comitato per la Radioprotezione in Ambito Sanitario – CRPS. Milan: AIFM; April 2022.

      6. Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Frazioni escrete: appunti metodologici ed esempi. Report Comitato per la Radioprotezione in Ambito Sanitario – CRPS. AIFM, MilanAugust 2022
      7. International Atomic Energy Agency. Management of radioactive waste from the use of radionuclides in medicine. TECDOC 1183. Vienna: IAEA; 2000.

      8. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Screening Models for Releases of Radionuclides to the Atmosphere, Surface Water, and Ground. Report No. 123. Bethesda, MD: NCRP; 1996.

      9. International Atomic Energy Agency. Generic Models for Use in Assessing the Impact of Discharges of Radioactive Substances to the environment. Safety Reports Series No. 19. Vienna: IAEA; 2001.

      10. AcegasApsAmga SpA. – Hera Group. https://www.acegasapsamga.it/attivita_servizi/acqua_ciclo_idrico/depuratore_servola/ (accessed July 15, 2021).

        • Homann S.G.
        • Aluzzi F.
        HotSpot Health Physics Codes Version 3.0 User’s Guide. National Atmospheric Release Advisory Center at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
        LLNL, Livermore, CA2014
      11. HotSpot Health Physics codes (Version 3.1.2 - February 11, 2020). https://narac.llnl.gov/hotspot (accessed December 7, 2020).

      12. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals. Publication 53 Ann ICRP 1988;18(1-4).

        • Legget R.W.
        A physiological systems model for iodine for use in radiation protection.
        Radiat Res. 2010; 174: 496-516
      13. Gruppo EcoEridania – Essere SpA. https://gruppoecoeridania.com/le-aziende/essere/ (accessed July 15, 2021).

      14. Agenzia Prevenzione Ambiente Energia Emilia-Romagna (ARPAE). https://www.arpae.it/it/temi-ambientali/meteo (accessed July 15, 2021).

      15. United States Environmental Protection Agency. External Exposure to Radionuclides in Air, Water and Soil. Federal Guidance Report No. 15 (FGR 15). Oak Ridge,TN: EPA; 2019.

        • Jiménez F.
        • Debán L.
        • Pardo R.
        • López R.
        • García-Talavera M.
        Levels of 131I and six natural radionuclides in sludge from the sewage treatment plant of valladolid.
        Spain Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011; 217: 515-521
      16. EN 1991-1-2:2002: Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - Part 1-2: General actions - Actions on structures exposed to fire. The European Union Per Regulation 305/2011, Directive 98/34/EC, Directive 2004/18/EC.

      17. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiological Protection of the Worker in Medicine and Dentistry. Publication 57 Ann ICRP 1990;20(3).

      18. Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente del Friuli Venezia Giulia (ARPA FVG). https://www.meteo.fvg.it/home.php (accessed July 5, 2021).

        • Xu S.
        • Report S.AL.S.
        Screening calculations for radioactive waste releases from non-nuclear facilities, 2.
        Swedish Radiation Safety Authority, Stockholm2009: 2009
        • Beretta A.
        • Conte L.
        • Monciardini M.
        • Bianchi L.
        Radiological impact of low level solid radioactive waste disposed of with ordinary hospital refuse.
        Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 1997; 71: 223-226https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032057
      19. Avila R, de la Cruz I, Sundell-Bergman S, Hasselblad S. Radiological consequences of radionuclide releases to sewage systems from hospitals in Sweden. SSI Rapport 2007. Stockholm: Swedish Radiation Protection Authority; 2007. p. 10.

        • Carinou E.
        • Housiadas C.
        Practical guidance on the regulatory management of radioactive liquid discharges from medical, educational and research laboratories.
        Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2021; 193: 124-132https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab032
        • Sundell-Bergman S.
        • de la Cruz I.
        • Avila R.
        • Hasselblad S.
        A new approach to assessment and management of the impact from medical liquid radioactive waste.
        J Environ Radioact. 2008; 99: 1572-2157https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.12.005
        • Urso L.
        • Kaiser J.C.
        • Woda C.
        • Helebrant J.
        • Hulka J.
        • Kuca P.
        • et al.
        A fast and simple approach for the estimation of a radiological source from localised measurements after the explosion of a radiological dispersal device.
        Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2014; 158: 453-460https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nct263
        • Musolino S.V.
        • Harper F.T.
        • Buddemeier B.
        • Brown M.
        • Schlueck R.
        Updated emergency response guidance for the first 48 h after the outdoor detonation of an explosive radiological dispersal device.
        Health Phys. 2013; 105: 65-73