Advertisement

Spatial distribution of the imaging dose and characterization of the scatter radiation contribution in CyberKnife radiosurgery

Published:September 29, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.09.011

      Highlights

      • Dose to eye lenses in intracranial CyberKnife applications.
      • Spatial distribution of the imaging dose in CyberKnife applications.
      • Image degradation due to scatter radiation in CyberKnife radiosurgery.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      The imaging dose for intra- and extra-cranial CyberKnife radiosurgery applications was calculated and the scattered radiation reaching the digital detectors was quantified and analyzed with regard to its origin.

      Methods

      The image guidance subsystem of the CyberKnife was modeled based on vendor-provided information. The emitted X-ray energy spectrum for 120 kV was estimated using the SpekPy software tool. Monte Carlo (MC) image acquisition simulations were performed to calculate the total, primary and scattered photon fluences reaching each detector as a function of the imaged object dimensions. MC calculations of the imaging dose were performed for intra- and extra-cranial applications assuming 120 kV and 10 mAs acquisition settings.

      Results

      The amount of scattered radiation reaching each detector was found to depend on the dimensions of the imaged anatomical region, contributing more than 40 % to the total photon fluence for regions more than 20 cm thick. More than 20 % of this scattered radiation originates from the contralateral imaging field. A maximum organ dose of 1.5 mGy at the nasal bones and an average dose of 0.37 mGy to the eye lenses per image pair acquisition was calculated for head applications. An entrance imaging dose of 0.4 mGy was calculated for extracranial applications.

      Conclusions

      Scattered radiation reaching each detector in the skull and spine tracking applications can be reduced by acquiring the pair of radiographs sequentially instead of simultaneously. A dose of 3.7 cGy to the eye lenses is estimated assuming 100 image pair exposures required for treatment completion.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Moutsatsos A.
        • Pantelis E.
        The CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery System. Springer International Publishing, CyberKnife NeuroRadiosurgery, Cham2020: 31-43https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50668-1_3
        • Kilby W.
        • Naylor M.
        • Dooley J.R.
        • Maurer C.R.
        • Sayeh S.
        A Technical Overview of the CyberKnife System.
        Handb Robot Image-Guided Surg, Elsevier Inc. 2020; : 15-38https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-814245-5.00002-5
        • Kilby W.
        The Target Locating System for CyberKnife Neuroradiosurgery. Springer International Publishing, CyberKnife NeuroRadiosurgery, Cham2020: 45-57https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50668-1_4
        • Ding G.X.
        • Alaei P.
        • Curran B.
        • Flynn R.
        • Gossman M.
        • Mackie T.R.
        • et al.
        Image guidance doses delivered during radiotherapy: Quantification, management, and reduction: report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group 180.
        Med Phys. 2018; 45: e84-e99
        • Murphy M.J.
        • Balter J.
        • Balter S.
        • BenComo J.A.
        • Das I.J.
        • Jiang S.B.
        • et al.
        The management of imaging dose during image-guided radiotherapy: report of the AAPM Task Group 75.
        Med Phys. 2007; 34: 4041-4063
        • Fu D.
        • Kuduvalli G.
        A fast, accurate, and automatic 2D–3D image registration for image-guided cranial radiosurgery.
        Med Phys. 2008; 35: 2180-2194
      1. Fu D, Wang H, Maurer, Jr. CR, Kuduvalli G. Fiducial-less 2D-3D spine image registration using spine region segmented in CT image. Proceedings Volume 6509, Medical Imaging 2007: Visualization and Image-Guided Procedures; p. 650935. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.711627.

      2. Hatipoglu S, Mu Z, Fu D, Kuduvalli G. Evaluation of a robust fiducial tracking algorithm for image-guided radiosurgery. Proceedings Volume 6509, Medical Imaging 2007: Visualization and Image-Guided Procedures; p. 65090A. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.711632.

        • Fu D.
        • Kahn R.
        • Wang B.
        • Wang H.
        • Mu Z.
        • Park J.
        • et al.
        Treating Tumors that Move with Respiration. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg2007: 265-282
        • Menzel H.-G.
        ICRU report 91.
        J Int Comm Radiat Units Meas. 2014; 14: 1-160https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru/ndx017
        • Bujila R.
        • Omar A.
        • Poludniowski G.
        A validation of SpekPy: a software toolkit for modelling X-ray tube spectra.
        Phys Med. 2020; 75: 44-54https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.04.026
      3. Hourdakis J C and Nowotny R. Instrumentation for dosimetry (Chapter 21) in Dance D R, Christofides S, Maidment A D A, McLean I D, Ng K H Technical editors. Diagnostic Radiology Physics: A handbook for teachers and students. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria, 2014, p. 525 – 549.

      4. Kawrakow I, DWO R, Mainegra-Hing E, Tessier F, Townson R, Walters B. EGSnrc toolkit for Monte Carlo simulation of ionizing radiation transport 2000. https://doi.org/10.4224/40001303.

        • Menten M.J.
        • Fast M.F.
        • Nill S.
        • Oelfke U.
        Using dual-energy x-ray imaging to enhance automated lung tumor tracking during real-time adaptive radiotherapy.
        Med Phys. 2015; 42: 6987-6998https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4935431
        • Lippuner J.
        • Elbakri I.A.
        • Cui C.
        • Ingleby H.R.
        Epp: A C++ EGSnrc user code for x-ray imaging and scattering simulations.
        Med Phys. 2011; 38: 1705-1708https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3555296
      5. Berger MJ, Hubbell JH. XCOM: Photon cross sections on a personal computer. Oak Ridge, United States, 1987. https://doi.org/10.2172/6016002.

      6. Schneider W, Bortfeld T, Schlegel W, C CC and HJ, DeMarco J J STD and SJB, du Plessis F C P WCA and LMG, et al. Correlation between CT numbers and tissue parameters needed for Monte Carlo simulations of clinical dose distributions. Phys Med Biol 2000;45:459–78. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/45/2/314.

        • Nobah A.
        • Aldelaijan S.
        • Devic S.
        • Tomic N.
        • Seuntjens J.
        • Al-Shabanah M.
        • et al.
        Radiochromic film based dosimetry of image-guidance procedures on different radiotherapy modalities.
        J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014; 15: 229-239
        • Sullivan A.
        • Ding G.
        SU-E-J-06: additional imaging guidance dose to patient organs resulting from X-ray tubes used in CyberKnife image guidance system.
        Med Phys. 2015; 42: 3264https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4924094